Yes, right. We could completely erase one third of exploitable vulnerabilities (by your numbers) only by switching to modern languages.
There is no good argument against that. Why wait for C or C++ to try and implement get another weird “solution” for those problems? (That no one uses then anyway)
Strawman argument. I’m not suggesting any of those things you made up.
I’m just saying that you can’t claim a program’s “memory safe” when it’s not. If a Rust program has zero unsafe blocks and uses zero unsafe libraries you can say it’s memory safe. Otherwise it’s not.
Yes, right. We could completely erase one third of exploitable vulnerabilities (by your numbers) only by switching to modern languages.
There is no good argument against that. Why wait for C or C++ to try and implement get another weird “solution” for those problems? (That no one uses then anyway)
Strawman argument. I’m not suggesting any of those things you made up.
I’m just saying that you can’t claim a program’s “memory safe” when it’s not. If a Rust program has zero unsafe blocks and uses zero unsafe libraries you can say it’s memory safe. Otherwise it’s not.