They’re mentioning the race and gender basically to say “a privileged person”. Having privileges obviously influences your character. And race+gender correlate with privileges.
So, while there’s no direct causation, and us white males who aren’t chumps don’t need to be offended, it’s often good enough of an explanation why a particular white male might be a chump.
It comes from an assumption that a person behaves that way because he’s a white male, and proliferates the assumptions that white males are normally behaving like that.
Should there be a black woman asking the question, this wouldn’t be mentioned, even though the act would be the same. As such, this is a vicious cycle of highlighting bad behavior in white males and then saying “look, they are like that” - something that’s been done in the past to justify racism and sexism towards black people and females.
oh now your other comment makes sense, you think “reverse racism” is real and you don’t like people calling you out on complete bullshit like “Should there be a black woman asking the question, this wouldn’t be mentioned”. fuck you, your performative respectability games, and your shithead nazi kin.
Removing things for their comfort but not having spiritual fortitude enough to cop to why they’re removing it. tl;dr revealing how the sausage is made. They’ve at least got it up enough to casually admit to believing it’s possible to be ‘racist’ against the dominant oppressor; but that def doesn’t explain anything else…
They’re mentioning the race and gender basically to say “a privileged person”. Having privileges obviously influences your character. And race+gender correlate with privileges.
So, while there’s no direct causation, and us white males who aren’t chumps don’t need to be offended, it’s often good enough of an explanation why a particular white male might be a chump.
It comes from an assumption that a person behaves that way because he’s a white male, and proliferates the assumptions that white males are normally behaving like that.
Should there be a black woman asking the question, this wouldn’t be mentioned, even though the act would be the same. As such, this is a vicious cycle of highlighting bad behavior in white males and then saying “look, they are like that” - something that’s been done in the past to justify racism and sexism towards black people and females.
oh now your other comment makes sense, you think “reverse racism” is real and you don’t like people calling you out on complete bullshit like “Should there be a black woman asking the question, this wouldn’t be mentioned”. fuck you, your performative respectability games, and your shithead nazi kin.
Feeemales
what does this mean?
Removing things for their comfort but not having spiritual fortitude enough to cop to why they’re removing it. tl;dr revealing how the sausage is made. They’ve at least got it up enough to casually admit to believing it’s possible to be ‘racist’ against the dominant oppressor; but that def doesn’t explain anything else…
I’m also seeing them remove stuff worth removing, and most of my comments are still up, to give credit where it’s due
Same kind of “even-handedness” Reddit deployed to get rid of CTH when the outcry against TD got too hot afaic. You’re more charitable than me.
I guess I’m in a good mood haha