• Atomic@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    No, some are talking about how it needs to detect gravitation from other planets.

    That has nothing to do with a time machine working on earth.

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      The time machine would use gravity so it can arrive at the same relative position in a different time. But that only gets you on the planet, not the same position on the planet.

      How would rotational movement be accounted for in a generic way?

      • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        How would rotational movement be accounted for in a generic way?

        I don’t know how it would be accounted for in your imagine time-machine. Because they don’t exist.

        What I do know. Is that you don’t need gravity to “detect” earths rotational speed. Because we already know what it is.

          • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            And is there a reason you couldn’t program that data into the machine?

            Doesn’t that sound like something you’d need? Along with a mathematical model of how earth orbits the sun?

            • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              If the machine has the ability to jump in time and space (needed to land in the same spot) then it would be a real waste to use it only on earth.

              So we would need a mathematical model of the entire universe that is accurate to the metre over all time. This N body is much harder than the 3 body problem.

              Or we use gravity and other methods to track relative stationary position.

              So, what other methods can be used to determine rotation?

              • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                Jesus fucking Christ. We can still calculate the rotation of a body like we normally do.

                You observe it. Wait 1 seconds. Observe it again. And the delta in position is your rotational speed per second.

                That is the method. The only one

                • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  So all travels to new planets require 2 jumps. One to get near and measure the rotation, and one to actually land. I’d prefer something more efficient.

                  Also there is the assumption that the surface rotational velocity is constant over time. This is only true for solid planets without gas or liquid centers. Insides can spin at different speeds than the surface.

                  • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    I don’t even know what this conversation is about anymore. You wanna go inside a gas giant now?

                    How about this. When you develop timetravel through space in all dimensions to “jump” anywhere at any time. Let us know.