• deus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    They’re all lickable, it’s just that some you can only lick once.

      • Arcity 🇵🇸🇺🇦@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Nothing, because you can have only one atom of it. Multiple will just form molecular hydrogen H2. That one hydrogen atom will aggressively rip of another hydrogen of a molecule of water for example, but it won’t be noticeable.

      • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        In the hypothetical, if one were able to lick elemental hydrogen in its atomic, rather than molecular form, it would have a few potential effects. The one that would concern me most would be its aggressive reactivity, ripping hydrogens away from anything that it could in order to achieve stability. This would potentially cause tissue damage both from the deprotonation and shift in pH.

          • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            It would be more likely a secondary or tertiary effect. That is, H• radicals ripped away from their parent molecules would leave •OH, •R, and •RNH radicals. These are unstable and highly reactive, “desiring” to have that stable electron configuration. Likely, this will result in elections being shifted to bring in more stable species, like OH-. Overall, we’re looking at effectively a deprotonation of the saliva, with extra intermediary steps to stabilize the radicals.

            • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Interesting. Given that H• is a neutral species, what would cause the preference for the creation of stable negative species (freeing up H+) over the creation of stable positive species (freeing up OH-)?

  • Simon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    That’s hilarious because me and my brother licked lead fishing weights for fun as a child. It’s probably why I’m retarded.

        • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Better, but still a few issues.

          Promethium, radium, curium, and Californium are all radioactive enough to cause rectal damage. Conversely, I don’t think phosphorus (black or red) or selenium are reactive enough to cause much harm.

      • Simon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I guess it’s only implied but any liquid is inserted as a solid - e.i. below its melting point. It’s assumed anything crumbly has a suitable binding agent.

        A few of them are definitely wrong as has been pointed out to me but I’m glad we’re all learning about science!

  • brian@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    But does this imply licking it in a “lickable” state? I have a hard time imagining licking a gas, and licking hydrogen as a liquid at -250 C or so sounds, not great.

  • FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’d bump up cesium, rubidium, and probably potassium to “please reconsider”, as I would not want to stand near you

  • bahbah23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I would avoid licking zinc. It’s a necessary nutrient but it doesn’t take much to me your stomach up.

    • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I think yellow is actually fine - a lick is 3 seconds of contact maximum and you’re not sucking on it or ingesting it…

      Sodium’s the only one you’ll ingest decent quantities of and it’s just gonna taste fizzy and soapy with no real lasting damage, stuff like lead you won’t even ingest and even if you did it’d probably be fine in such low quantities, even mercury is probably ok to lick if you’re careful

      That said, with the radioactive ones you need to be careful of what isotope and sample size you’re licking, so licking a huge ingot of U235 would probably do some lasting damage just by being near it, but licking a small piece of U238 is more than likely fine so long as it’s solid and not dust

  • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’d say downgrade Mercury to yellow. Licking Mercury won’t hurt you as long as you hold your breath.

    Having it close to your breathy parts is always not a great idea though.