• tleb@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Whitelist and blacklist were indeed cancelled despite having no racial origin.

      • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        It doesn’t have racial origin, but it has pretty strong racial connotations.

        What isn’t racist if even basic colors are racist?

        • SamC@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          22
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s a bit more than just using colours though isn’t it?

          It’s saying:

          White = good

          Black = bad

          Just because it’s not inherently racist, doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be changed. And most people don’t seem to have a problem with changing

          • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yellow road lines mean something different than white road lines. The hard drives I buy have black and red product names (one is faster than the other). Are these racist or just really convenient ways to differentiate ideas?

            • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The good/bad white/black trope has been basic symbolism for a long time.

              Might have been a day/night thing but certainly gets racial in today’s 1D cultural filter.

          • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The good/bad white/black trope has been basic symbolism for a long time.

            Might have been a day/night thing but certainly gets racial in today’s 1D cultural filter.

          • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            White = light, day, sun -> great for human daily activities, so it’s positive

            Black = darkness, night -> spooky, dangerous and not great for human activities, so it’s negative

            That can be universal, not tied to a specific culture.

    • tonarinokanasan@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are cultural traditions of using colors as symbols, many of which are harmless – red for anger, blue for sadness, green for envy. Whitelist and blacklist come from the very long-standing theme of using white to represent good and black to represent evil.

      Regardless of how you feel about the origin of those themes, it makes sense to start moving away from them now. Whether intentional or not, they can be harmful and aren’t really necessary.

      • Reliant1087@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Let’s also start removing phrases with white, yellow and brown as those are used to refer to people’s skin colour as well.

        The only reason I would even contemplate not using blacklist or white washing is if an actual person of that skin colour says that it is not okay for them, or there’s an actual consensus among people of that community that it isn’t acceptable.

        I can tell you as a person with brown skin, with brownie or whatever used as a derogatory name, almost everyone I know isn’t even concerned with terms like brown out or brown note.

        Online outrages or articles aren’t an accurate depiction of reality.

        Even more dangerously, shit like this drives outrage and diverts attention from actual, real issues faced by people of different races. Like not having stuff to eat or indoor plumbing or mental health infrastructure or access to health care.

        • Hello Hotel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yes, i dont know and have a hard time figuring out if there really is a culture that is upset at us one would call reasonable. I so often see soundbytes that any real explanation is burried by high school drama.

          TL;DR the group is likely more upset that we took away their democracy than our name for filters.

        • shiii@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          22
          ·
          1 year ago

          The only people being outraged are people like you when someone is using a different word.

          I watched an ig reel that said people react to anything different to them either with fear or judgement. Get over yourself, have some empathy, and move on.

          • Skates@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh shit, well if you watched an Instagram reel then it’s probably true.

            Note though how I’m here reacting to something different with neither fear nor judgement, just with sarcasm.

          • Reliant1087@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s your take reading a post talking explicitly about how a person won’t be outraged about something without actually taking into consideration how the people who the issues is about feel or act?

            Maybe you should stop for a moment, think over what you’ve said and read, and consider that many of these discrimated groups can actually think for ourselves and doesn’t need to be told what to be outraged over?

      • kameecoding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        not only that but whitelist-blacklist are just bad names.

        even greenlist-redlist would be better (at least while we have light signals at intersections) as green means go red means stop are more universally understood.

        but allowlist and blocklist are just plain better, they are self explanatory words. you don’t need to learn what they mean since it’s right there in the name.

        whitelist-blacklist are names where you need to learn the meaning of them, sticking to them just because they were used in the past is not the best argument.

        • Hello Hotel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Words often work like unique signifiers “symbols”, often by using them you learn them and dont question it. Thats a neutral phenomenon. It has advantages and disadvantages. Mainly, redlist is as disconnected from meaning as blacklist is. Requiring the understanding of what a “car” is, and why they cant “wheel their way” thru a cross shaped road becuse of a colored light being there. It sounds really stupid when put like that, but accessability is important.

          • kameecoding@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            it isn’t though. you don’t need cars to learn red means stop, we literally had miniature roads, crossing and signs at my pre-school (or whatever it’s called in English, the one you go at age 3 till 6, you start school at 6).

            Stop sign is red, pedestrian crossing are just red - stop, green - go. you learn that from a very young age so the association is natural.

            Also, just to be clear, I didn’t say redlist is good, just that it’s less stupid than blacklist.

            • Hello Hotel@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Fair, the idea of “going” will be there and hopefully, likely its symbols will stay relivant.

            • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              How is blacklist stupid? Green and red aren’t natural, in fact black/white makes more sense because it represents a binary choice (true/false, off/on).

        • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They came from voting in ancient Athens were people had a white ball and a black ball. You put one or the other into a jar, a black was a no vote, white was yes. It has never had anything to do with race. If it bothers you change the words for skin color instead then.

          “whitelist-blacklist are names where you need to learn the meaning of them”

          You could say this about every word. All language is based on past usage.

      • Hello Hotel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Never liked these debates as “making the words comfortable (to myself, others or both)” (from both sides) matters most.

        I find that usimg that soundbyte results in people (including me) to not knowing the cultures your refering to and most without being informed assume that their irrelivant (Hence the original reactionary response). Since the debate has in bad faith on nobody’s intent become about “comfort”, ill give that perspective. Personally, Allowlist and blocklist “just work” (no discomfort). Blacklist and Whitelist are natural feeling and I fully understood the soundbyte reason. For that I can respect depricating the word but banning it (if thats even the goal) is uncomfortable. Ill happly abandon my position if a good argument is given. For now I subconciosly use what word was already there.

        Edit: boilerplate is way too harsh, dont like conforntational tone.

        • tonarinokanasan@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Honestly I haven’t heard much rhetoric around anyone banning these terms. But if moving away from them IS good, and the entire catalyst for this conversation is “YouTube chose to use newer, more preferable terms”, then isn’t that a good thing?

          • Hello Hotel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Thats what I wanted to communicate, deprication is a fairly normal part of software. Computer interfaces in all their forms are just contracts of expectation, social contracts are simmlar. Deprication of marking an expectation as a mistake.