fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 months agoAdvanced Mathsmander.xyzimagemessage-square5fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageAdvanced Mathsmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square5fedilink
minus-squareassa123@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months agoWell, those properties are only for holomorphic functions, otherwise its just as hard or worse.
minus-squareKogasa@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months agoHolomorphicity is equivalent to (or defined as) being differentiable in a nonempty, connected, open set, so it’s not asking much. Even then, functions which fail to be holomorphic can often be classified in a similarly rigid way.
Well, those properties are only for holomorphic functions, otherwise its just as hard or worse.
Holomorphicity is equivalent to (or defined as) being differentiable in a nonempty, connected, open set, so it’s not asking much. Even then, functions which fail to be holomorphic can often be classified in a similarly rigid way.