• treadful@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m far from a Luddite and I think robots in general are cool. But I kind of don’t have an issue with people fucking up autonomous roaming robots. I haven’t rationalized that opinion just yet, I guess. Just feels right.

    Philly did nothing wrong

    • chaircat@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      I don’t think waving away being a Luddite just by saying so makes it so.

      I can’t think of a single angle of principled moral theory that makes this okay. Vandalizing or stealing someone else’s property they paid for. Hurting both the restaurant and the customer by depriving them of their food. Holding back progress on an invention that can reduce the need for humans to engage in a type of work that is hard, dangerous at times, and low paid.

      From a purely rational on paper view, it doesn’t look terribly different than saying vandalizing or stealing from delivery vehicles driven by people isn’t wrong. What possible justification could there be for this view besides Ludditism fuck robots?

      • AeroLemming@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        I don’t think that robots should be allowed to take up space on our sidewalks. Sidewalks are meant for people to travel on and we shouldn’t be inconvenienced by having to avoid some annoying-ass robots rolling down the middle of them all the time. They ought to be considered motor vehicles and banned from sidewalks. That being said, Sstealing people’s deliveries is wrong and I don’t think it’s a good way to combat robots encroaching on our space.

          • AeroLemming@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            11 months ago

            I was thinking you could pick them up and set them in nearby bushes or something so it’s out of everyone’s way. You aren’t damaging it and it’s impossible to argue that robots should have right-of-way. If you overturn them, the company might be able to bitch that you scratched the paint or something.

      • FredericChopin_@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        I wonder if people had more prospects would crime go down?

        That’s a rhetorical question by the way. Petty crime is a failure of society.

      • treadful@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        11 months ago

        groans

        I don’t think waving away being a Luddite just by saying so makes it so.

        Guess you know me better than I know myself.

        From a purely rational on paper view, it doesn’t look terribly different than saying vandalizing or stealing from delivery vehicles driven by people isn’t wrong. What possible justification could there be for this view besides Ludditism fuck robots?

        Imagine thinking humans are rational beings the debate ethics every time they have a feeling. Sometimes you just gotta fuck shit up.

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Under captialism we lament robots taking our jobs, where under a better system we would be rejoicing.

      • AlDente@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Do you mean the better system where people would have the opportunity to cook better food for themselves instead of ordering fast food and paying exorbitant fees to have it delivered?

    • simonced@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      The rational could be that those robots are taking the job of a human being and deserve to be robbed…

      • SimplePhysics@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Using cars to deliver food pays very little, is dangerous (old guy with shotgun shoots your brains if you go to the wrong house), and is extremely bad for the environment. Current delivery workers could switch to a safer job with better pay and not damage the environment as much. Or we can implement UBI. Just a thought.

        • coffeebiscuit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          Well… an old man shooting your brains out for ringing the wrong doorbell is a complete different problem.

          We can also make robots to do that more efficiently.

        • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          I hate this argument… Do you have any idea how hard it is to get a job that pays a livable wage?

          People aren’t dealing with the dangers of delivery because they are lazy or unmotivated, they are doing it because they need the work and it pays barely enough to meet their needs.

          • SimplePhysics@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Yes, thats why we need some fucking change in the world. My argument is just saying delivery robots are not bad.

            Where the hell did I say delivery workers were lazy?

      • Excel@lemmy.megumin.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        That is LITERALLY the meaning of the “Luddite” position that has been disclaimed.