The French government is considering a law that would require web browsers – like Mozilla’s Firefox – to block websites chosen by the government.

  • jsdz@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Firefox being free software, it wouldn’t make much sense for them to try and do something like this. So obviously we know that Mozilla would never go along with such an absurd law and start doing censorship on behalf of France. … right, Mozilla? Slightly strange that you didn’t say so?

      • Khanzarate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        Firefox is open source but it’s controlled by the Mozilla Foundation.

        The steps would be

        1. Pass the law
        2. Tell Mozilla they’re breaking the law
        3. Do things to them as they’re breaking the law

        It could be fines, it could be banning firefox in France. The good/bad roles are flipped, but anything anyone has tried to do to meta can be done to Mozilla, too. The only alternative Mozilla would have would be purposefully pulling Firefox from France.

        Ultimately, Mozilla would have a vote of some kind, deciding to capitulate or pull firefox (or just keep paying fees, potentially, but they’re not made of money).

        • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          What stops them from putting a blanket statement on their website stating “this software does not adhere to specific internet laws in france and therefor we do not support the use of firefox as a browser within french borders. French people can still download firefox to study the software and use it for local/offline purposes.

          Firefox isn’t quite the same as facebook in that its a piece of downloadable software instead of a service website. You don’t need an account. A foreigner can travel while having firefox as the only browser on their laptop and people can still share the program between eachother.

          France might create requirements for their isps to not service not adhering browsers but in any way mozzila can keep their hands clean.

      • roguetrick@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They could still charge the leadership, fine them, and cause life to be a bit more difficult. Even if I don’t live in a country, I wouldn’t want that hanging over my head.

      • sab@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        I guess it cannot be completely enforced. What they can do, however, is to say that Firefox is illegal in France unless it complies with their unjust laws.

        Mozilla could either choose to comply and release a French version of Firefox with government mandated fixes, or decide not to comply and probably block firefox.com from being accessible from France. This would make it harder for French users to find an alternative browser, making even more people will stick to the pre-installed Chromium based one.

        In general it’s just not a good thing when open source software becomes illegal, no matter how hard the laws might be to implement.

        • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why would it be mozzilas responsibility to make their website unaccesible in france rather then that being the responsibility of french isp?

          If north Korea puts up an obscure law that says all sites are banned from using english does that give them grounds to sue any sites that didn’t think of blocking them specifically?

        • eterps@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This would make it harder for French users to find an alternative browser, making even more people will stick to the pre-installed Chromium based one.

          Sad as it is, I think this is the optimal solution when it goes through. A lot of EU countries are against monopolies (France is not an exception), this way they would realize they are enforcing a monopoly and singular dependency.

          • BubblyMango@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            They dont consider chromium based browsere a monopoly because there are over 10 different ones from different companies. The fact they are all chromium behind the scenes and all comply with google’s bullshit standards doesnt matter to them.

          • sab@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I agree. If you give in to laws like these you have already lost; people will just accept their freedom being stripped away piece by piece, and government control of software will be the new normal. If on the other hand we reach a point where Firefox is illegal in France, it should be obvious to anyone and especially those involved in competition law that something is not right.

            France is on a bad spree lately, and honestly they need all the bad publicity they can get. I hope this backfires for them.

      • hansl@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The software can be open source, the product is branded and published.

    • BentiGorlich@gehirneimer.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I hope that it would only be the “Frensh Version” of Firefox that implements this and that at least everone outside of France would get a version without this crap. This would then of course, be available to Frensh people to. Hopefully crap laws like this get stoped… lets see

    • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It would work for 95% of browser users, who will not know that they can use a fork of Firefox because they have no idea what that means.

      • kool_newt@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right, these type of solutions are akin to changing your SSH port number. It works >90% of the time, but anyone skilled or determined can easily bypass these restrictions for given targets.