Hypothetically speaking if I a 18 year old man paid a 48 year old woman to have sex with me and I wear a condom and we both consented to it is that morally wrong or is it morally okay?

In my opinion I think it’s morally okay if a 18 year old man pays a 48 year old woman to have sex with him as long as they are both consenting to it. Because what they’re doing is completely harmless.

  • pezmaker @sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    You might get differing answers due to the payment portion of the scenario, but here’s my 2 cents.

    No, there’s nothing morally wrong here at any level to me. This is legally ok as far as the ages go, pretty much everywhere.

    As long as there’s no power dynamic being abused, and both sides are consenting, go for it.

    • TrenGoblin@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      But what if hypothetically speaking a 16 year man has sex with a 21 year old woman do you think that is morally wrong or is it morally okay?

      In my opinion I think it’s morally okay for a 16 year old man to have sex with a 21 year old woman as long as the 16-year-old man is consenting to it and the 21 year old woman is not an authority figure to him because what they’re are doing is completely harmless.

      • ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        One of your scenarios is legal the other is not, simple as that. A 16 year old cannot consent in most places, no consent = immoral.

        • Zak@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          While older laws concerning statutory rape criminalize sex with children by way of the idea that they cannot consent to sex, modern laws concerning sexual abuse of children usually don’t reference the concept of consent. This allows for more severe penalties when there’s actually no consent, as the offender can also be charged with sexual assault.

        • TrenGoblin@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          The age of consent is 16 in most parts of the world is 16. So you are literally just wrong on that. In Canada a 16 year old can legally consent to having sex with whoever they want as long as the person they are having sex with isn’t an authority figure.

          A 14 year old can also legally consent to having sex with anyone who is 5 year older than them in Canada.

      • rtxn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        A minor can’t consent, period. Even if they say all the right words. That’s what “statutory” means in statutory rape. It is the adult’s responsibility to avoid and disengage from that contact, at all times.

        Considering the power dynamic between someone who is legally a child and is restricted in some liberties, and an adult who has far greater liberties, trust, and power, I certainly wouldn’t consider it ethical.

      • SoupBrick@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’d recommended googling, “Why is there an age limit for consent”. I’d put a link, but I do not want that search connected to me in any way. When it comes to these issues, it is good to do some research to see if there is already an established researched reason before asking for random people’s opinion on it. Sometimes, people get stuck in “bad” echo chambers that try to justify certain behaviors. The best thing to do is look up some studies on the issue to form an educated opinion on it.

        Obligatory: I am against any form of pedophilia and do not support it in any way.

        • TrenGoblin@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Im strongly against pedophilia because a prepubescent Child 13 and under does not know the long term social ramifications of having sex with someone. They can not informly consent to have sex with an someone.

          A 21 year old having consensual sex with a 16 year old is not pedophilia and it is ephebophilia.

          And I do not think ephebophilia is morally wrong as long the 16 year old is consenting to it and the 21 year old is not an authority figure to the 16-year-old because what they’re doing is completely harmless.

      • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        a 16 year man

        I’d venture a guess that in most developed countries, a 16 yo is not considered a man by legal or social definition.

        I also feel like you’re now not asking questions in earnest, but rather with ulterior motive.

      • KillerTofu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        If you think the genders matter in this hypothetical, that says a lot. No, age of consent exists for a reason.