• jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s the unchecked capitalism.

    Better labor protection and antitrust laws would help, but the fundamental push is towards maximum exploitation of worker and customer. Power consolidates and then abuse for profit becomes easy.

    • exocrinous@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Whereas in a communist economy where people didn’t have to struggle to survive, game developers could focus on improving their craft and telling whatever the funnest story they can think of is. We can already see this on a small scale with the difference between indie passion projects like Hades, and AAAA cash grabs like suicide squad. Imagine if everyone could afford to chase their passion instead of money.

      • BigFatNips@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Don’t understand why you’re being downvoted. The only thing there I disagree with is the use of the word “economy” 😂

        • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Probably because leftists use “communism” like it’s an immediate and obvious goal, but dismiss any criticism of past efforts to actually get there. It effectively becomes an unquestionable fantasy.

    • PseudorandomNoise@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s unchecked because customers don’t really care. When is the last time there was a boycott of a game due to how the developers are treated?

      • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Capitalism doesn’t get checked by consumers, there are a billion things too much to properly pay attention to and no viable alternatives.

        It gets checked by either regulations and laws or replacing it with something else.

        • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          There are so many viable alternatives. I’ve got an increasingly long list of things I won’t tolerate in games anymore, and I’m nowhere near running out of games to play. The big problem is being able to identify which of those checkboxes are checked or not; PC Gaming Wiki is working for this purpose lately, though it shouldn’t be necessary.

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Boycotts are only one tool in the box. Legislation should be addressing things like consolidation of power and anti consumer practices.

        Unfortunately, the US has one far right party that has many lunatics that don’t believe in government (along with other insanities), and one center-at-best party that does that wield power effectively.

    • metallic_substance@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      No, that’s very short sighted. In the long run, they are ruining innovation, which will ultimately ruin the industry.

      It was hard to not mimick your shitty arrogant emphasis to shame your awful take.

    • Xephonian@retrolemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Capitalists are people. People will always corrupt a system for personal gain. Which is why communism is such a silly idea. It’s always immediately corrupted. Capitalism assumes people are corrupt and has provided the greatest standard of living in history. It saved China.

  • TKRyer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Believe it or not, video games are art, and art is no longer for art’s sake. It’s for shareholders. That’s when these decisions happen.

    • dellish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Right! Can you imagine if Rembrandt had an executive committee behind him dictating what to paint a picture of, then micromanaging brush strokes? That’s the games-for-shareholders model, and it’s fucked. Games are best when made by people who are passionate about the project, not solely about the profit. My big hope now is the publishers learn from the Sony debacle and simply publish the game, be happy with their profit cut, and shut the fuck up.

      • MurrayL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Can you imagine if Rembrandt had an executive committee behind him dictating what to paint a picture of

        I get what you’re saying, but you realise all the great renaissance painters worked on commission, right? So yes that’s exactly what happened.

        • Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          When someone comissions a painting, they choose the subject and that’s about it. Sure if they didn’t like it they might not pay, but that’s probably already more hands off than any publisher in the games industry.

    • olafurp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Return to Obra Dinn is some quality piece of art. There are still people making art instead of marketing.

  • gaael@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s true, and it’s a subset of another reality: execs are ruining life.

  • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Remove video games. Execs and more importantly shareholders, are ruining the fucking world.

  • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Execs should be made to provide benefits to society. I saw we blend them into nutrient paste and use it to make food for our hungry people.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Take this with a grain of salt because I can’t think of the proper search terms to verify what I think I remember reading:

      Once upon a time corporations couldn’t be created unless they proved a benefit to society. We really need to go back to that…

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I mean, the earliest corporations were colonial expeditions, so it would depend on your definition of “benefit to society” to say if that was really a good thing.

        • applepie@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Well at leads “youur country’s” peasants benefited some how… We can’t even get that from these parasites

  • MidRomney@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Activision has fucked Warzone 3 so badly, and it’s actually so incredibly improved from what it was during the disaster that was WZ2 but still a far cry from the peak that was WZ1.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m trying my hardest to not buy any “AAA” game. The major corporations have lost me as a customer, I’ll only be buying indie games.

      … except monster hunter… It’s been part of my life too long and it’s one of like 3 game series I always play with an old friend lol

      • Jax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah capcom is one of those weird ones. Really aggressive monetization but god damnit the games are good.

  • yamanii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    What’s happening to games in this gen is just what happened to the larger tech industry before, MBAs that pretend to be human are put in charge of a product after creators already made it successful.

  • Beetschnapps@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    “Even when you believe you’ve found yourself the right job, it can evaporate in an instant, and then you are suddenly competing against hundreds or thousands of people for every job position,” Kai said.