https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.10002
Abstract (emphasis mine):
The concept of a ‘Ballmer Peak’ was first proposed in 2007, postulating that there exists a very specific blood alcohol content which confers superhuman programming ability. More generally, there is a commonly held belief among software engineers that coding is easier and more productive after a few drinks. Using the industry standard for assessment of coding ability, we conducted a search for such a peak and more generally investigated the effect of different amounts of alcohol on performance. We conclusively refute the existence of a specific peak with large magnitude, but with p < 0.001 find that there was a significant positive effect to a low amount of alcohol - slightly less than two drinks - on programming ability.
Surely that’s work worthy of an IG Nobel prize?
I’ve found that the best way to utilize alcohol when programming is to code sober and comment drunk. It’s a wonderful way to make commenting both fun to write and to read later.
I have tried coding under the influence, but I can’t do it. Even small amounts of alcohol makes it really hard to do anything complex. But if it works for you, good on ya.
I did some of my best problem solving on Vicodin.
Two beers and I’m fully functional.
Also works for customer service. Have a ridiculously minor issue that really doesn’t matter but still irks a small part of you and you’re too much of a wimp to speak up about? Check your sent folder in the morning after a night of drinking.
Protip: support@company.com.
The Inebriati strike again.
There’s obviously an xkcd for this
Posted Oct. 1 2007.
“first proposed in 2007”
I wonder if Randall has seen this?
Lol that is Fig 1. In the paper :)
The centre is .1337
p < .0001337
You have way too many zeroes.
I’d argue that this is for the XKCD, not the other way around.
The concept of a ‘Ballmer Peak’ was first proposed in 2007
where do you thnk it was proposed?
I cannot code unless sober from all stimulants except coffee.
Alcohol is not a stimulant.
Fine, depressant or stimulant.
Depressant or stimulant (except that one stimulant)
I tried coding while 420 once. Could not think straight.
Use your time travel abilities more wisely friend.
I can imagine being that old would make it difficult to think straight, tbh. What’s your secret?
The Unity office in Bellevue used to have beer on tap in the cafeteria. Idk if it still does what with all the fuckery going on… Maybe one day I’ll actually go into the office and I can report back
Humblebrag
If you walk around Microsoft’s office buildings, you’ll see several people’s personal offices with full bars in them.
The basis of the paper
Also, https://xkcd.com/323/
Welcome to the Knights Tipplar.
I came to post this, but I’m happier to see that it’s already here!
I absolutely know this is case with my writing. Really helps you enter a flow state. Not to be trifled with, Mitchell and Webb did a sketch on it actually and they also went with “just under two drinks”.
Here’s the sketch: https://youtu.be/VTSCppeFzX4?si=kXnXSTiF1xWo-d9J
I do it with many drinks and then send before I sober up. You just have to pray that you never see that text again.
Write drunk, edit sober.
In my experience I can write more code after a few drinks. However I usually find that the code is of low quality when I check it the next day…
Really? I’ve written code so advanced while drunk that I couldn’t even understand it the next day, but it did what it was supposed to do and solved complex issues.
So you’re saying you can’t write readable code while drunk
If you can’t understand it, is it high quality?
I have no idea! But it looked very complicated and advanced, and did what it was supposed to do. LOL
I mean maybe that just means you were bad at naming which is the hardest part! When I’m sober I spend a lot of thought on naming things, and when it gets skipped over while drunk I’m just like wtf did I write?
I have written brilliant code while drunk that I didn’t understand the next day. I doubt I could have even solved the problem sober.
This also works for pool. Don’t ask me how I know.
This applies to a lot of physical activities as well. I have a friend who’s a really good bowler, and every one of his 300 games (perfect score for you non-bowlers) has been when he’s had exactly 2 drinks. He can’t do it with less because he gets too nervous - and more means he gets too sloppy and loses his edge.
We joke and call beer “bowling juice”.
I’ve also found another peak somewhere after 6, I lost count. I couldn’t stand straight but I went like 34 kills to 6 deaths in a vr shooter.
I think this may be true for many things.
I’m a better motorcycle rider after a couple of beers. The beer relaxes you and your body just does what it needs to do, instead of tensing up with fear.
Maybe that’s true, but is it really worth the risk?
Yes! I don’t drink any more though, but it sure was fun when I was younger. I should clarify in the original post that I was talking about dirt bikes.
That does make it sound a little better. At least then you were probably only risking harming yourself.
We were never harmed in a decade of doing that, so I’d call it a win. I’m not talking about getting hammered, I’m talking about having a couple of beers before you go riding.
You sound like a donorcycle rider. One who is casual about potentially traumatising and/or injuring others.
I’m talking about riding in the dirt.
To be fair, if they really, honestly, stick to one or two drinks, they should be under the legal limit in most places in the US. This depends on their weight and the strength of the drinks, too, but anyone over 120 pounds is normally still under the limit after 2 average strength beers.
The problem is that it’s easy and tempting to overdo it, but as long as they have self discipline to not ever drink too much, it can be fine.
Legal doesn’t mean safe; it just means the lawmakers are too corrupt, stupid, cowardly, or weak to tighten the limit.
I wonder if there’s a comparable effect for machining
You should propose this research; maybe you can get a grant!
