• Kissaki@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    But at the point where you actually become a good landlord, it’s more of a public service than something you actually make money on.

    Why is that a but? They’re still a landlord, right? I really don’t get the attempt of separation of the same thing.

    • qarbone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Because most people don’t get into real estate to do public good. Most people get into real estate, become landlords, to make money off people’s need for land and housing. It’d be like trying to whitewash criminality because vigilante heroes exist. Yeah, vigilantes might exist and are technically criminals, but that’s not really the core conception of “a criminal”.

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Because if you’re a landlord as an individual, a a human being, you’re not what people mean when they say “landlord”. You rent property - you can do that with a conscience, but that doesn’t deserve the title of landlord

      The term “landlord” refers to people who own homes as a business - people who create layers between them and the people they affect, bureaucracies or sheer numbers they can min-max without guilt.

      That subtle difference is everything

      • Kissaki@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        How do you call an individual that rents you a place then?

        https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/landlord

        A person that leases real property; a lessor.

        I really don’t see the distinction. And while I’m not a native speaker, I’ve never heard nor think this is a common distinction or understanding.

        Landlord is singular. It does not sound like a company or manager.