• MajorHavoc@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’ve seen this sentiment before, but I’m waiting to switch until I learn how to add the microphone and camera quick toggles included in GrapheneOS to LineageOS. Is there a project for that?

    • FractalsInfinite@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      So if I understand you correctly, Graphene OS does everything it says it does but overhypes its differences with other forks. That doesn’t sound like snakeoil, only effective marketing.

      Why shouldn’t I use it over the other forks then, particularly because useful features like hardened_malloc are only avalible on Graphene despite being widely ported to linux distros?

      They also do not shill for Big Tech or Google/Apple.

      What’s the story behind this? I’m genuinely curious.

      I will say I strongly dislike how the developer has handled criticism, but that seems to be more a failing of the dev then a problem with the OS.

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I sometimes come across influencers pushing chrio “treatments” on pets or newborns, saying it makes them “breathe better” or be “more energetic”

      It’s infuriating

      • EnderMB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’ve told this story before, but newborn chiropractors are a thing, and many new parents will take their BABIES to get their neck and back snapped around. It’s frankly fucking disgusting.

    • Irelephant@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I used to see a lot of threads on reddit about people who got injuries from cheap chiropractors.

    • VaultBoyNewVegas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Holland and Barrett sell supplements. Some people do need to take a vitamin d tablet a day. I do but I’ve got a prescription for a vitamin d and calcium tablet because I’ve been low for years.

      • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I take vitamin D about 5 months out of the year. Stupid fall back daylight saving time is part of it. Makes me furious my already battered mental health has to get worse from changing the clocks.

        • Fosheze@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Be careful with vitamin D though. That is one of the very very few vitamins that you can actually take too much of because it’s fat soluble, not water soluble, so excessive vitamin D will build up in your fat cells rather than just getting peed out. It’s called vitamin D toxicity (VDT) and it can have some unpleasant neurological effects among other things.

          So it’s probably a good idea to get your levels checked anyways just to make sure you’re taking the right amount if you need it.

    • bruhduh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Problem is, people go to chiropractor when they don’t have access to real doctor, problem either the money or/and most doctors in your city/state can’t/refuse do anything about your problem, desperation is one hell of a stimulus

        • candybrie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          The thing is, placebos can actually be pretty effective. Hell, they’re effective even if you know they’re a placebo. And the more elaborate and similar to what you think would be involved in curing you, the more effective. So people going to chiropractors might actually be getting real results even if the things they’re doing are junk.

      • EnderMB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I can somewhat understand this. I have IBS, and most people with a bowel issue will tell you that IBS is basically your doctor saying ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

        Instead of getting help from your doctor, you go online and you hear about people finding relief through taking weird supplements, or eating only rice, or taking pre and probiotics of varying types. None of it has any proof, but it’s better to try something than to struggle - and sometimes you’re lucky or you find some short-lived relief.

        The difference is that there often isn’t evidence for these things working, whereas there is plenty of evidence out there that says that chiropractors are doing legitimately dangerous practices to your body. The difference is that someone is trying to make a profit from this lack of knowledge.

        • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’ve had loads of advice like that for IBS, but no amount of FODMAP or probiotics actually makes a difference, because my IBS is stress-triggered. My doctor helped by advising me to avoid stressful situations, which is hard when you move to another country.

        • rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Osteopaths (who have a Doctorate of Osteopathy and are often referred to as DOs) go to medical school and receive training that’s almost exactly the same as an MD.

          • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            the difference (so i’m told) is that DOs are trained to take a more holistic, full-body approach to diagnostics and treatment rather than only focusing on one set of symptoms/treatment. They also do their residencies and internships alongside MDs.

            • rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Yes, I’ve heard some people say that they trust DOs more because they’re more deliberately trained to look at a larger picture of a person’s health. I don’t have my own opinion since I’ve never met with a DO.

              • EtherWhack@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                My PCP is a DO. It works for me as my body is still relatively young. (late 30’s) I also don’t have many issues that would require more intensive/specialized treatment that I don’t already have a specialist for.

        • hedgehogging_the_bed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          DO are real doctors. Rarer than MDs because there are less schools but totally real docs. My Mom with 30 years nursing experience says their training is basically identical, but DOs are generally nicer.

        • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          It depends on the country. Everywhere but the US, I believe, osteopaths are witch doctors on the same level as chiropractors. In the US, they were originally like that, but their professional organization basically pushed it into being a real medical degree.

          Now they go to the same length schooling as MD’s, and take the same exams as far as I know.

          The core of the whole discipline, osteopathy, is a pseudoscience, though. While they are usually competent doctors they still have that core of pseudoscience. They like to market themselves as more “holistic”, but that’s usually a good dogwhistle term to let you know information not supported by science is going to follow. They bring up that they are the same as MDs, but with additional training in osteopathy, but that can’t be true because the schooling is the same length, so to fit in the pseudoscience, they get less science.

          The real reason why we have DO’s is that we don’t have capacity in our country to educate enough MDs, so we have this weird parallel system.

        • Atropos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I was not familiar with this term and had to look it up. From my brief search, it also seems like snake oil, and I don’t know why someone would not go to a real physical therapist instead.

      • ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        A chiropractor 💯 fixed my throwing arm that I had been dealing with for over 10 years. Made me an absolute believer. That said, I’ve been to two different chiropractors and they were wildly different in everything they did. Dr Lopeig in Great Falls, Virginia is an absolute wizard.

  • Lionheadbud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    To be honest, the oil of a snake is probably pretty nutritious and would surely correct certain deficiencies

    • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I always thought the point was for the vitamins to be absorbed by your skin. Human skin absorbs all kinds of stuff so as long as the vitamins make contact it sort of makes sense?

      Though I suppose for most people it won’t have much of an impact unless you have a severe vitamin deficiency.

    • residentmarchant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I don’t know anything about how it works, but I assumed it was absorbed by the skin on your head not the actual hair.

      I still doubt that putting vitamin whatever on your head everyday will actually make a difference

    • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah but you gotta remember “vitamins” is just a dumbed down term to refer to fats and compounds. It’s not actually like food or anything nourishing for the hair. Like a lot of haircare stuff has vitamin e in it, which is supposed to help protect hair from hot blow drying damage and also make it shiny. A lot of the stuff is also moisturizers for your scalp.

    • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Vitamins yeah that’s no good.

      Things like fruit, honey, or flowers must be good though right?

      I mean, my wife’s honey pomegranate and hybiscus body scrub must be amazing with all that fruity yummy stuff.

    • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      PH numbers in any hair washing/conditioning product that gets rinsed out.

      You end up with the PH of the water, people.

      • PunnyName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        The problem is thinking anything cures the cold or flu. Once you have it, you have it until it runs its course. The only way to cire either would be to completely eliminate them or how they function in the body with medicine that doesn’t currently exist.

        • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          There are a number of antiviral medicines, some of which work against influenza A and B. I’m pretty sure these are prescription medications in Canada.

    • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      This is a common misconception of the placebo effect. The placebo effect is a measurement issue, not an actual benefit.

      Tests are corrupted by using the reposnes and judgement of humans. People will say they had some sort of benefit because of expectations, poor recollection and politeness. It doesn’t mean a benefit was gained. A placebo group allows researchers to quantify how much the placebo effect has on the data they gathered, they can then see if the experiment they did had any effect. Placebo is literally our definition of zero effect.

      Anyone telling you placebo is a good thing is wrong, misinformed or deliberately misleading you. In many countries it is illegal for doctors to prescribe ‘placebo treatments’. They will still recommend such things to their patients - not because they work but because they get the patient out the door and less likely to come bother them again.

  • molave@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Majority of the “AI inside” software and solutions. It’s in a bubble and everyone is throwing crap to a wall hoping it sticks.

    • Irelephant@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      notice how all of those crypto features were quietly removed from platforms after people realised they were paying millions for some numbers, i think that will happen with Ai

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      “AI” is the new “blockchain”. It’s a solution looking for a solid problem to tackle, with some niche applications

      • III@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I just wish people had long enough memories to see the cycle for terms like these. Some new word catches vogue, companies fall over themselves trying to find ways to implement them for shareholders and consumers who have no idea what they actually represent. As that fades, a new term arises… it’s sad.

        • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          And virtual reality gets a free revival every other technology, while we’re at it.

          I’m predicting VR coming back into the limelight, try again, shortly after everyone loses interest in AI.

          Also, I’m still pissed that flying cars aren’t in the limelight more. I was promised daily updates, and I’m not seeing them. That’s the biggest proof that the media is completely disconnected.

      • Irelephant@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I mean, at least Ai has SOME useful applications, the blockchain was just wasting energy for some numbers.

        • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Blockchain also has some useful applications. Most (but not all) of them are also possible with technology and such that existed when bitcoin was first created, at far lower cost for a minor tradeoff in accuracy. On top of that, almost none of them are related to speculative markets.

          It’s a way to do distributed transaction logs in a non-refutable and independantly verifiable way. That’s useful and important, but it was a solution in search of a problem. Even for the highest security, most at risk transactions, the existing international fincancial systems are “good enough” to ensure reliability of transaction logs.

          In the end, blockchain and now AI are just falling victim to con men trying to milk as much money as they can from things before people build a working understanding of them. They’ll just keep moving onto the next big thing as it comes.

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I am so over hearing about AI. It’s getting to the point that I can assume anyone dropping the term at work is an idiot that hasn’t actually used or utilised it.

      It’s this LLM phase. It’s super cool and a big jump in AI, but it’s honestly not that good. It’s a handy tool and one you need to heavily scrutinise beyond basic tasks. Businesses that jumped on it are now seeing the negative effects of thinking it was magic from the future that does everything. The truth is, it’s stupid and people need to learn about it, understand it, and be trained in how to use it before it can be effective. It is a tool, not a solution—at least for now anyways.

      • Frisbeedude@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        The truth is, it’s stupid and people need to learn about it, understand it, and be trained in how to use it before it can be effective.

        So, like a hammer. A very expensive, environment-destroying hammer.

        • saltesc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          That’s actually a pretty good analogy.

          I think more like discovering making fire or something. 90% of all the energy burnt is people worshipping it as it blazes away, never actually fulfilling any practical use except being marvelous to be around.

          But once the forest is all chopped down, people are forced to understand fire and realise a couple small logs in a contained place was all they needed to have it be incredibly effective.

          Oh, but that’s too hard. It’s magic right now. All hail the AI bonfire!

          • Frisbeedude@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Massive energy consumption. Huge datacenters and not enough green energy. Now they want to build small nuclear plants. Without talking about the waste problem.

            • bountygiver [any]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Their waste is less destructive than coal plant though. Perhaps this could be a silver lining to finally get nuclear back in action and get closer to dropping coal once and for all.

            • notfromhere@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              So AI uses energy, and it’s how we are choosing to provide that energy is destructive to the environment? So AI isn’t itself destructive.

              • oo1@lemmings.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                Ah yeah, just choose a different energy souce. Simples.

                Have you seen the growth in % of renewable (incl, nuc biofuel and waste) electricity generation over the past 30 years. (36% i in 1990 , dropped to about 33% in late 2000s up to 38% recently) this is global, IEA figures.

                There have been two years since 1990 when renewable electricity output has grown faster than total electricity demand. 2008/9 recession and 2020 covid. The only way renewables will come close to meeting current electricity consumption is actually to start reducing those demands.

                If we start transerffing gas( domestic heating), and petrol( low-capacity road transportation) onto the electricitry grid then the scale and speed of renewables needs to ramp up inconcievably quickly - it has grown fast over the past decade, but it hasn’t been cheap nor has it been fast enough to keep up with current demands.

                TBH I don’t know where AI lines up next to EVs in scale of potential extra demand, probably lower but still an added demand (unless it can substitute for other stuff and improve efficiency somehow).

                Electricity source is not really a choice, it is resource and tech constrained many sources are needed; the cheapest fuels will continue to be in the mix used so long as demand keeps increasing so fast.

                Maybe, If you ran all AI in peooles houses in cold countries in winter, it’d substitute for heating - that’d be one way it could reduce its impact. Or maybe it can get its act together and spark widespread, frequent, deep, long lasting recessions in economic activity.

                • notfromhere@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Maybe renewables is not the solution to our energy needs if it can’t scale up like we thought it could. Conservation of energy is not the answer. We as a society must find new, cleaner, sources of energy. Maybe AI can help us do it.

      • freebee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        There’s one good use case for me: produce a bigload of trialcontent in no time for load testing new stuff. “Make 2000 yada yada with column x and z …”. Keeps testing fun and varied while lots of testdata and that it’s all nonsense doesn’t matter.

        I’ve found that testing code or formulas with LLM is a 50/50 now. Very often replying “use function blabla() and such snd so” very detailed instructions while this suggested function just doesn’t exist at all in certain language asked for… it’s still something I’ld try if I’m very stuck tho, never know.

      • vrek@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I equate an AI to an intern. It’s useful for some stuff but if I’m going to attach my name to it I’m going to review it and probably change a lot about it.

    • mesamune@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      My research was literally on AI back in college. Most AI solutions are just basic algorithms and don’t use real AI solutions. There’s a huge difference.

    • smackjack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I just got a notification on my phone telling me that I can chat with my PDF documents. Why the fuck would I want to do that? Do these companies realize that literally no one is asking for this shit? I also saw an ad for a computer mouse that had AI inside it. Whatever that means.

      • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Oddly enough, that’s one of the few functions I’ve found the LLMs useful for. Looking through big pdfs for specific information, lots of times “ctrl+f” doesn’t do the trick because the exact term I’m looking for doesn’t appear. Worse sometimes it’s a phrase that could be in there under many synonyms. Using the LLM to find the actual info is pretty nice, it just isn’t “AI”.

      • suction@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Don’t knock it too quickly. I thought like you but one evening I was a little tipsy and started chatting with a PDF document. Let’s just say things got a heated and not we’re engaged.

      • Hugin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I just got a notification on my phone telling me that I can chat with my PDF documents

        I belive you got that notification but I honestly have no idea what it even means.

        • smackjack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          It’s from the Adobe Acrobat app. Basically you can ask it to give you a summary of whatever document you’re reading.

    • Nomecks@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s even better than that. A lot of companies are taking NVIDIA’s pre-built workflows, running their data through them and selling the results as their own AI. “We build proprietary RAG AI!”

    • Default_Defect@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Watched a bit of a video of a guy that went to Computex and asked any vendor with AI plastered somewhere what they were doing with it. Most spouted some meaningless word salad and a few literally shrugged.

    • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I can’t wait to get a Smart AI refrigerator that tells me I have a bunch of food that isn’t really in there even when I didn’t ask it to.

  • zout@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    CBD oil. It doesn’t matter which exotic ailment you’re talking about, someone will ask you if you’ve tried it and that they think it might help.

    • cor@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      this is the first thing that came to my mind too….
      there is some medicinal value to it, but usually not what they claim it to be, and usually not in the form that it’s in….

    • Elise@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’ve seen one of those fake bottles. It seemed too cheap to me so I looked up the ingredient dosage and it was near nothing. Real cbd oil is quite expensive.

      Personally I can recommend cbd pills. It’s easy and you can dose it very precisely to your liking. In the nl you can get them over the counter, as is the case in many other places I imagine.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Also, CBD honestly needs the same warnings as Grapefruit since it works on the same metabolic pathways and can decrease effectiveness of certain drugs.

      …like my cancer drugs.

      If your drugs say to avoid grapefruit… You should probably consider skipping CBD as well.

      • Chuymatt@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Had a patient with a really bad reaction to a topical chemotherapy agent because he was moisturizing with CBD oil and wasn’t telling anyone about it. In trying to understand what was going on, it turns out that CBD specifically slows the metabolism of this particular chemotherapy, so it was building up in his skin.

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Oi vey tell me about it.

          I’ve gotten way more wary about the stuff I put in my body since I got on these cancer drugs.

          Increased depression is actually a symptom of my cancer, and I had a lot of hallucinogenic mushroom caps I had stored away for a rainy day, and a friend suggested maybe that would help. Recent studies as well as our own personal experiences spoke to the idea that a good “trip” can help alleviate depression.

          But my immediate reaction was… there’s basically been no studies done on the interactions between psilocybin and the drug I am taking. Literally, who the fuck knows what could happen? The reminder that I had them actually lead me to give them away because, fuck me, I’m not risking it.

    • flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      CBD does … something. It makes me sleepy. So at least for some people it can serve as a sleep aid.

      Not to me though I just tried it out of curiosity, I have no desire to be even more sleepy

  • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Any weight loss pill drink, or food. It’s all scams built in top of scams.

    Those new ones based on diabetes medicine seem nice, but as soon as you stop taking them their effects wear off. They’re a medically induced crash diet. The real hard work, fixing your bad habits long-term, still needs to take place.

    • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I tried one if those weight loss food systems once. I’ll say it’s not really a scam, but if you knew what you were doing, you could do better.

      They basically controlled what you could eat so that you ultimately consumed less calories so you could lose weight without having to count calories, or manage macronutrients. But it was also expensive and the food was terrible, and as you said, as soon as you get off of it, you go back to the way you were. ****

      However, I do have to thank it for opening my eyes and helping me understand calories and macros a whole lot better. Not to mention proving to me that I could in fact lose weight, back when I thought it was just the way I’d be forever. Because then I started looking into why it worked and what I needed to do to stop buying that crap and eat real food again.

      • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Oh, that’s not what I meant. Weight loss programs, especially the ones designed to help you maintain weight for the long term, work well. I’d say they’re probably the best way to lose weight if you can’t do it alone (and very few people that really need it can). There are some bullshit ones, but there are also great alternatives.

        What doesn’t work is the “drink a bag of this powder every day and you’ll lose weight automatically” bullshit. Sometimes this bullshit is also sold as berries, sometimes it’s some foreign kind of nut, but new “magical weight loss food” bullshit pops up a few times per year and desperate people will fall for it over and over again.

    • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Any [emphasis added] weight loss pill

      Nope. There’s one that actually works really well. It’s called 2,4-dinitrophenol. It works by fucking up the way that your body makes/uses ATP; instead of being available for cellular respiration, it gets wasted as heat. It’s like constantly doing cardio; you’re burning tons of calories without doing anything. Users have reported losing up to seven pounds of fat–not water–in a week. The downside is that this heat can lead to hyperthermia if you take too much, and since the half-life is quite long, by the time you start seeing the negative side effects from OD’ing–about a week after you OD–it’s way to late, and your brain cooks. Oh, and you’re gonna sweat like a watermelon at a Baptist barbecue the whole time.

      It was thought that it also caused cataracts, but that seems to have been incorrect.

      It’s been banned since the 40s, I think, as a diet pill, because people had a tendency to take too much and die. If you know where to look, you can still find it. I wouldn’t recommend it for the overwhelming majority of people though.

      • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah, that’s the thing. Weight loss by pill is only possible in a few ways. Diuretics temporarily cause weight loss. The only real options are drugs that decrease your food intake (like the new diabetes drugs), presumably drugs that could interfere with nutrient absorption (not sure if any of those are out there, but it seems like it would be sketchy), or drugs that increase what you burn.

        People think that last category could be magic, but burning calories is called burning calories for a reason; it’s an oxidation reaction, and it generates heat. There are a few others that also seem to really work, basically all stimulants: nicotine, caffeine, and methamphetamine (which is available by prescription).

        • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Amphetamines both reduce appetite and increase how much energy you expend. Oh, and they’re also super addictive. So, yeah, don’t use those. I was definitely thinner when I was a smoker, but I had much worse health.

      • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Now that’s interesting! I can see why they took it off the market because of hyperthermia risks, but that would kind of be the perfect weight loss pill for me in the winter months…

        • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Honestly, the only people I know that use 2, 4-dinitrophenol (DNP) regularly are body builders, and they use incredibly dangerous drugs on the reg anyways, so a diet pill that can kill you if you fuck up is just par for the course. There ain’t many old bodybuilders…

          Here’s just a brief overview of people that have died from it. Since dose is dependent on weight–2-10mg/kg of bodyweight per day, depending on a lot of factors–you can’t safely buy pills as a one-dose-fits-all; you would have make your own capsules, and probably have a pretty solid understanding of geometric dilution.

          So, yeah. It works. But it’s Russian roulette.

          • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Oh, I definitely wouldn’t go near that stuff, too easy to mess up and die. Every dose is a dance with death (unless you’re an experienced doctor and/or pharmacist, maybe). I do like the concept, though, just boosting passive energy consumption during times when it’s easy to get rid of the excess heat. Seems less addictive and long-term-death-y than the ones messing with the already-messed-up glucose regulation systems.

  • UpperBroccoli@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Anything sold by Gwyneth Paltrow in her online shop, which I will not name here so as not to promote it. In the best case, goods sold there will be harmless and entirely useless. In the worst case, they will cause serious harm.

  • franzfurdinand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I have a couple from the hip actually, because America has grifting baked into it’s soul. In no particular order:

    • MMS (Drinkin’ bleach)
    • Crystal healing (most sellers)
    • WitchTok kits (TikTok influencers selling expensive spices)
    • Brain pills
    • Any product peddled by a megachurch (see the Baker bucket for a great example)

    As more of these come to me, I’ll try to expand the list.

    • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Any product peddled by a megachurch (see the Baker bucket for a great example)

      Some megachurches have sold freeze-dried prepper food. It’s not a grift per se, because it’s perfectly edible freeze dried food, but it’s overpriced for what you’re getting.

      • franzfurdinand@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        You’re right, but I was thinking of the buckets that are basically terrible quality slop that’s borderline inedible.

        I might still call it a grift because they’re asking for payment as “donations” to skirt paying taxes on them. That, and like you said, it’s not a great value for what you get. Maybe not pure snake oil, but there’s definitely still enough dishonesty involved imo that I’d be comfortable calling it a grift.

    • Irelephant@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I would say that a lot of stuff being peddled through tiktok and Instagram are scams. Those anti-5g dongles come to mind.

      • franzfurdinand@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Anti-5g dongles? That’s new for me, but I consume a lot of these grifts secondhand through a few podcasts I listen to. I might be behind.

        Sounds like the bones of a good scam are there though, assuming the anti-5G conspiracy still gets traction and clicks.

        Edit: Do you know if someone like bigclive got one? He takes those sorts of devices apart a lot to explain them and I’d love to see what’s inside. I just don’t want to pay the money for one to fund the grift.

        • Irelephant@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          There is a good few videos on them, it has died down significantly since the whole 5g panic went away. Some of them were just some clear USB keys, some were just stickers. Mr. Whosetheboss did a video on them.

        • Mr_Wobble@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Plus, if you make the top of it concave, you can cook hotdogs up there in the summer!

    • Maeve@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Idk about prevagen but my opthomologist definitely said any generic of preservation is very good, and artificial tears with flax seed oil will definitely relieve dry, itchy “sandy eye” feel. Idk if he really believes that or not but I thought I’d give some drops a try. Last time I tried artificial tears, it burned like soap so I hope it’s not a waste of money.

      Oh I looked it up, there may (study funded by the industry) be a basis for that. Medical News Today