• Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think Shadow is referring to Palworld’s similarities to Pokemon. There had been a lot of tension over whether or not Nintendo would try to sue the Palworld dev, so it stands to reason that selling something so contentious on Nintendo’s own platform might be a bit awkward.

      • Shadow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        That doesn’t mean Nintendo is going to go grant a license to a game where you can enslave and kill animals.

        • Bilb!@lem.monster
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Nintendo doesn’t really restrict things in that way. It would be very strange for them to block a game from publishing on switch for those reasons.

          • Zahille7@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Right? Like they’re not exactly the “family friendly” company just because they have simple games with cartoonish art styles.

            Wasn’t Leisure Suit Larry on GameCube? And there were a few zombie games for the Wii and Wii U.

    • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      What tension? Fans being stupid?

      Nintendo is litigious yea, but there’s hundreds of emulators out there that haven’t been sued, they only sue people who do blatantly illegal stuff they can sue them for. What has palworld done that’s illegal?

      Emulators are legal, so they leave the legal ones, they go after the ones perpetuating the illegal parks, like Yuzu.