• magic_lobster_party@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    That book probably doesn’t go much further than neural networks with 1 hidden layer. Maybe 2 hidden layers at most.

    IMO, statistics is about explaining data. Regression is useful to explain how parameters relate to each others. Statistics that don’t help us understand data isn’t useful statistics.

    Modern machine learning has strayed far away from data explanation. Now it’s common to deal with more than a dozen hidden layers. It might have roots in statistics, but mostly it’s about brute forcing any curve to the data. It doesn’t help us understanding the data better, but at least we have approximated some function.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you have any ideas about how statistics are at the bottom of LLMs, you are probably thinking about some other ML technique.

      It might have roots in statistics

      Care to reiterate?

        • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Wheels have roots in carriages

          Whether you are a badass with a horse carriage or a cuck with a horseless carriage doesn’t really drive home your point