U.S. Army Special Operations Command, in a lengthy study, reported a wide range of “overtly sexist” comments from male soldiers, including a broad aversion to females serving in commando units. The comments, it said, are “not outliers” but represent a common sentiment that women don’t belong on special operations teams.

“The idea that women are equally as physically, mentally and emotionally capable to perform majority of jobs is quite frankly ridiculous,” said one male commenter. Others said they’d quit before serving on a team with a female, and that serving in such a situation it would create problems and jealousy among their wives.

  • grue@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    There are lots of countries that have compulsory military service with alternatives for conscientious objectors (which is basically what you’re describing).

    I agree that it’s a good idea. Moreover, it comes closer to the original meaning of that whole “well-regulated militia” thing. We should consider doing like the Swiss do: give (roughly) everybody mandatory firearms training, send them all home with an infantry standard-issue assault rifle, and then severely restrict access to ammunition except for legitimate purposes like practice at the firing range.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Here in the US I’m pretty sure our Supreme Court would rule that ammunition is speech.