U.S. Army Special Operations Command, in a lengthy study, reported a wide range of “overtly sexist” comments from male soldiers, including a broad aversion to females serving in commando units. The comments, it said, are “not outliers” but represent a common sentiment that women don’t belong on special operations teams.

“The idea that women are equally as physically, mentally and emotionally capable to perform majority of jobs is quite frankly ridiculous,” said one male commenter. Others said they’d quit before serving on a team with a female, and that serving in such a situation it would create problems and jealousy among their wives.

  • Tedesche@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It revealed that “the vast majority” of the negative attitudes toward women serving in special operations “unfortunately did come from senior noncommissioned officers. So it does seem to indicate that it is generational,” Command Sgt. Maj. JoAnn Naumann, the most senior enlisted soldier in the command, said in a call with reporters Monday about the findings.

    Well, that’s rather predictable and good news for the long run. Just retire these dinosaurs and replace them with younger soldiers. No more old boys’ club.

    And while we’re at it, why don’t we get rid of the selective service system or force women to be join it? Equal rights, equal responsibilities.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Germany used to (I think used to) have a system where, for a year, you either joined the military or did a civilian service job like work in a hospital or nursing home. I’m by no means a warmonger or interested in a bloated military, but that doesn’t sound like a terrible idea to me.

      • grue@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There are lots of countries that have compulsory military service with alternatives for conscientious objectors (which is basically what you’re describing).

        I agree that it’s a good idea. Moreover, it comes closer to the original meaning of that whole “well-regulated militia” thing. We should consider doing like the Swiss do: give (roughly) everybody mandatory firearms training, send them all home with an infantry standard-issue assault rifle, and then severely restrict access to ammunition except for legitimate purposes like practice at the firing range.

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Here in the US I’m pretty sure our Supreme Court would rule that ammunition is speech.

      • jmp242@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Philosophically it’s a horrible idea to me, being from the US. First, it’s pretty against ideas of freedom and self determination. Secondly, and worse, is that conscripts often are basically an internal sabotage threat. Work to rule, no interest in anything but getting out, actively tend to hurt morale given their resentment, etc. Oh, and 1 year of training / 1 year of service is basically a little past basic training, so not really well trained for modern combat. See what Russia is getting with conscripts for instance. I suppose if you just want bodies to throw into a meat grinder it might work, but unless you have enough to take staggering losses to overwhelm better trained and higher morale troops - and you’re willing to take those sorts of losses… the conscripts are just mostly a drain on resources IMO.

      • Yepthatsme@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        They have that in the US and it’s called Peace Corps but since the 80’s the conservatives hate it and push for military instead.

      • MahatmaGandhalf@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It was a pretty big waste of money. You’d have massive numbers of people who’d have to be half-assedly trained for a lot of money just to leave service again right when they started to be somewhat employable. There are reasons why we don’t do it like that anymore.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fair enough, you know better than I would having lived through it. I don’t know about the practicalities of such a plan, I just think teaching people to serve the community when they’re young is a good idea.

            • Motavader@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I strongly believe that everyone should work a customer service job like retail or waiting tables early in their career. It would make a lot of people less of an asshole when interacting with employees.

          • SwingingKoala@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Pay is still abysmal, and importing workers from poor countries or forcing young people to work in that sector is peak capitalism.

              • ITypeWithMyDick@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                But that would mean I would need to look up data and educate myself, and then my pointless ramblings look silly!

              • SwingingKoala@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                I assume you’re not German, and unable to perform a basic web search for news etc in German? Please confirm so that I can tell you what to search for.

        • SaakoPaahtaa@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lmao conscription service is far from “killing for your country”. Its amassing a reserve the size no other country wants to challenge. I went through my service like all other normal able bodied men of my country and it was mostly learning to walk and laying in a bush. Fucking fun it was.

          And even if situation arose to killing, killing for your country is the most noble and always morally correct thing to do.

            • MyFairJulia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              And the funny thing is: Why do we die for the old cunts in the parliament? Guess what, it’s other old cunts sending soldiers!

              Except that in case of war we wouldn’t die just for them but also the other people we protect from the soldiers of the other old cunts but nevertheless we die at the behest of old cunts.

  • AttackBunny@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not to diminish anything enlisted woman have gone through, but this is by no means unique to military service. I am a women, who works in a very male dominated field, and the hostility, belittling, sexism, etc I have to endure, that my male counterparts don’t is massive.

    • AllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m in IT, the difference in how I’m treated before and after I transitioned is crazy. I haven’t legally changed my name yet so I just pretend to be a guy for all my jobs solely to avoid that.

      • AttackBunny@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        About a year ago I decided to remove my name from my email signature. It’s mind boggling how different email replies/inquiries are now. People just assume I’m a man because making cars go fast = men things. When they finally meet me, or talk to me on the phone, there’s an instant demeanor change. Some not bad, others hostile.