• phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    Of course they don’t.

    The second they do, their base might start realizing that they’re fucked, that their children might die young due to the effects of climate change, and that its all caused by the very people they voted for.

    Tar and feathers would be the least of their worries, they would be shredded toes first.

    So better not mention it, with the added benefit that you can keep pushing laws that get you even more monies

  • Red_October@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    Of course it doesn’t. The GOP plan regarding the climate is “Ignore it and the problem that doesn’t exist in the first place will go away.” This plan is deeply unpopular with anyone who sees climate change as a problem, and for those who don’t simply not mentioning it at all is in keeping with their values anyway. “Ignore it.”

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      It’s worse than that.

      The GOP plan on climate is “We’ll capitalism out way out of it.”

      Record high temperatures? Sell AC units and increase prices on electricity.

      Water getting more scarce? Buy inefficient desalinators that run on diesel.

      Property values declining due to increasing ocean levels? Ban ocean levels.

    • Alue42@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      Here’s a taste of the GOP view:

      I used to be a government employee in the state of Florida (when Rick Scott was governor) as an environmental educator. One day, we received a memo that for all government employees the phrases “climate change”, “global warming”, and “sustainability” were now banned from our official duties. How was I supposed to teach about the environment in Florida without using those? I was still allowed to say “unusual weather event”.

      I left this role, and Florida, and heard that this policy had been repealed.

      Wouldn’t you know it, I heard from some of my colleagues still there that DeSantis just went ahead and did the same thing, while also making sure the new law impacts the energy grid.

      So not only is their plan to ignore it - but they want to force no one else to talk about it either, or make any improvements on their own of their own volition.

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    I think they are quite content to do absolutely nothing about our most pressing social and environmental issues. I struggle to remember the last time I heard an actual attempt at a solving a real problem. Mostly, I hear rhetoric and personal takes.

  • Steve@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    “The hottest year on record”. This is becoming a joke, right?

    1. 2010
    2. 2014
    3. 2015 / 2022
    4. 2016
    5. 2017
    6. 2018 / 2021
    7. 2019
    8. 2020
    • YeetPics@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      It makes sense to say “the hottest year on record” if “practically every year is the hottest on record now” and you’re talking about the most recent year.

      • Steve@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        24 days ago

        Does it make more or less sense than “Another year of record breaking heat”?

        “Hottest year on record” is like a child stopping on each step of a staircase saying, “I’ve never been this high!” It’s correct, but doesn’t mean much in context, and gets old real quick.

    • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      Everything I come across says that 2023 was the hottest year on record so far, but I don’t know the source of this info and I’ve never seen the list you provided.

      • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        At this point, if I understand the data correctly, the planet would need to get dangerously cold for the remainder of the year to not go down as the hottest year on record

      • Steve@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        I edited the list trying to make it more clear.

        The point is, most years since 2014 have been “The hottest year on record.” It’s kind of lost significance as as an outlier, when it’s generally a good bet next year will be hotter.

        • Cătă@mstdn.ro
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          @Steve It does sound geeky, but yes, it is technically correct to say about a year that is the hottest year on record.

          And the fact you pointed that every single year becomes the hottest year on record makes it even more dangerous and shows that we need to take proper measures.

        • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          Yeah, it would be good to word it more precisely. Hearing the same phrase every year doesn’t have the impact they think it does. I’m kinda curious as to what would sound better 🤔

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      Constant headlines about “the hottest ever” are getting stale. Takes the meaning out hearing it over and over and over.

      Sounds like mom, “it’s the hottest/coldest day of the summer/winter!” Yeah mom, it’s the hottest or coldest day many, many times a year.

      I’m also tired of, “smashed records!”, when it was 1 or 2 degrees over the record.

      Don’t know how else to report it, but people are letting these headlines go in one ear and out the other. There’s no real impact to the reader.