• peto (he/him)@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I’m neutral on the subject of if there are non-observational interactions. Though I ask again, are you aware of any observations that do not involve interactions?

    Edit: I should also point out, that I don’t believe an observation necessarily requires a human, mind, or intelligence.

    • bunchberry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Why do you keep asking that? I already explained I’m not claiming observations = no interactions in extensive detail and you turn around and ask me that gain.

      • peto (he/him)@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Because you seem to have a problem with me saying that all observations are interactions.

        Futher, if it is true that if observations are interactions, then RQM must be true, surely it goes from a fringe interpretation to just simple fact unless you can find a counterexample?

        At this point, I’m not even sure I quite see what your point is supposed to be.