For example, could alternative terms like “carbon reducing” and “carbon increasing” make it more clear and avoid misinterpreting which means which?
For example, could alternative terms like “carbon reducing” and “carbon increasing” make it more clear and avoid misinterpreting which means which?
Sounds like bookkeeping where you have to know what half the book you are on before you decide if the negative sign is good money or debt.
Carbon credit and debt in double entry book keeping. Genius. It’s likely how an actual carbon credit system would work and the entire reason for the confusion.