• Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yes. But it makes the second sentence make more sense.

        And for the answer, the Jurassic Park “see, nobody cares” meme would fit in well.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      As in “We haven’t cut emissions to zero yet.” We can, and will. It’s a question of whether we do it quickly enough to preserve a civilization-supporting climate.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        We should probably start with reducing the rate of increase first. Then talk about reducing emissions per year. As for zero emissions, I fail to see how we have a civilization of any sort without some emissions. Maybe that’s the point. Was “Net Zero” a hidden word for collapse all along?

          • hobovision@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            That’s a really hopeful reading of that chart. What I see in that chart is that even a year or two of falling emissions could quickly be wiped away. Just look at 2022.

      • Einar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Likely not. The next years will be hell. Then, after 10 years or so - maybe sooner -, 2024 will be remembered as one of the more pleasant years with still bearable temperatures and comparably few catastrophes. We even still had affordable coffee and olive oil.