It’s still quite active. Use court listener RECAP if you want to see the docket and read opinions, not these paid garbage sites.
They have a browser extension where anybody who pays for the document via PACER can then upload it for them to host. It’s a good nonprofit doing what our government should do.
For anyone curious, I couldn’t find an exact statistics but hearing aids in the US cost between $2000 to $8000 per pair with the average costs sitting around $5000-$6000 per pair.
Insurance coverage varies per insurance provider and per state. It looks like many people will end up paying the maximum required by law before insurance takes over which is roughly between $1000-$3000 depending on state.
Not only is a single purchase expensive, you usually have to replace them every 3 to 5 years.
Imagine Apple destroying your son’s hearing and your lawyer says, “Welp, $75,000 sounds like the going rate for the ability to hear normally. Let’s sue one of the biggest corporations in the world for that amount.” Then you go along with it.
I searched and the only update I can find is that Apple managed to get the gross negligence and fraud by non-disclosure complaints dismissed along with the request for punitive damages. All locked behind a paywall though. Case is Gordoa v. Apple Inc et al, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 3:22-cv-02900 for anyone that has paid access to legal databases.
PACER charges per page. Mirrors charge less than that. The best is court listener, which doesn’t have a paywall but might not have all documents. They’re nonprofit.
The reason courts charge is because they decided to fund the filing services by lawyers paying for it instead of general taxes.
This is serious and I hate that I can’t find a follow-up.
I managed to figure out how to follow the case
It was reassigned to a random court because Apple declined to appear in front of a magistrate: https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/44577491/Gordoa_et_al_v_Apple,_Inc_et_al
then that court dismissed the case: https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/44560022/Gordoa_et_al_v_Apple,_Inc_et_al
so basically nothing came of it
Thank you for the more thorough search.
WTF?
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63314762/gordoa-v-apple-inc/
It’s still quite active. Use court listener RECAP if you want to see the docket and read opinions, not these paid garbage sites.
They have a browser extension where anybody who pays for the document via PACER can then upload it for them to host. It’s a good nonprofit doing what our government should do.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Law_Project
Thank you! I don’t know much about law, so I was just looking on Google
No. It looks like it’s still pending. They just had to amend their complaint back in 2022.
I’m surprised they’re only asking $75k. That’s like half a hearing aid nowadays (hyperbole)
For anyone curious, I couldn’t find an exact statistics but hearing aids in the US cost between $2000 to $8000 per pair with the average costs sitting around $5000-$6000 per pair.
Insurance coverage varies per insurance provider and per state. It looks like many people will end up paying the maximum required by law before insurance takes over which is roughly between $1000-$3000 depending on state.
Not only is a single purchase expensive, you usually have to replace them every 3 to 5 years.
And that’s still forgetting they cannot bring the full quality hearing back.
Just went through this
I was only able to get mine because of a grant i found, which paid 100% of the cost (over $3k).
It should really be 7 digits, if not 8.
Imagine Apple destroying your son’s hearing and your lawyer says, “Welp, $75,000 sounds like the going rate for the ability to hear normally. Let’s sue one of the biggest corporations in the world for that amount.” Then you go along with it.
Should be $75 million.
It just gets more and more tragic doesn’t it.
I searched and the only update I can find is that Apple managed to get the gross negligence and fraud by non-disclosure complaints dismissed along with the request for punitive damages. All locked behind a paywall though. Case is Gordoa v. Apple Inc et al, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 3:22-cv-02900 for anyone that has paid access to legal databases.
Why the fuck are legal databases locked behind paywalls
PACER charges per page. Mirrors charge less than that. The best is court listener, which doesn’t have a paywall but might not have all documents. They’re nonprofit.
The reason courts charge is because they decided to fund the filing services by lawyers paying for it instead of general taxes.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63314762/gordoa-v-apple-inc/
Thank you for the more thorough search.