• SuckMyWang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Doing it as fast as possible would crash the world economy because everything is setup up for oil. So it seems obvious what needs to happen, it’s a different story when you personally are now homeless and you just want a roof and food. We can do a lot better than we are though

        • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          The alternative, parts of the world will be uninhabitable. Always gotta think about the economy… no matter how many people this is going to kill, or how much biodiversity we lose along the way.

          Is there any point of loss where we will say the economy isn’t important anymore, or do we have to be experiencing the loss already?

          • SuckMyWang@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            The problem is crashing the economy will kill a lot of people right now, no need to wait or come up with a better solution

    • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s way more than cars. Plastics, chemicals, energy, shipping, fertilizers, pesticides, even food additives can trace their ingredients to oil and gas. We’ve structured our whole society around oil since World War I, and getting out of it isn’t going to be easy.

    • futatorius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Chinese power generation has produced more CO2 this year than ever before. They’re also bringing renewables online, but electricity usage has risen too. So we’re closer to turning the corner, but haven’t done so yet.