• Schorsch@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      The ad machine doesn’t need my money. They never even asked. I am the product to them.

    • abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I mean unless Mozilla starts getting sued by Ad companies to force them to ban ad blockers, I don’t think that will happen because being able to have ad blockers is a major selling point.

      But even if it does happen, Firefox is open source and has been forked, so the next alternative is LibreWolf.

  • RadioFreeArabia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I really hope there’s a significant rise in Firefox -and derivatives- usage share. It will be good for everyone, even those stuck on Chromium browsers.

      • CafecitoHippo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        The biggest pro for me is the vertical tabs. It’s got the same vertical tabs that Edge has which are great. I only use Edge at work but it’s great especially when you have a web based production environment like nCino that you work in all day and have dozens of tabs open. You can group them up nicely and keep yourself organized. Floorp is based off of Firefox ESR so it’s on an older build (but up to date security). The current build is based off FF 115 while FF is on 129 now.

          • CafecitoHippo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’ve tried but for some reason, I can never get them set up correctly and I’m not technologically illiterate. Its been a while since I tried it though since Floorp just works.

  • Anonymousllama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Pretty happy with Brave, but I’m guessing that being a downstream chromium fork they’ll eventually be stuffed and forced into using V3?

      • SuperIce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        The Google antitrust decision will result in Mozilla losing 90% of their revenue since Google won’t be allowed to pay them to use their search engine anymore.

      • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Mozilla makes about $590m a year.

        $510m of that is from Google paying for the search engine default spot.

        • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          That’s a ridiulously low amount of money given the amount of users. I’d happily pay 10-20 bucks a year to keep mozilla alive. Not that I like it much, but more so than the big alternatives

        • UNY0N@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Well I for one hope they figure out an alternative income, like a premium subscription? Or perhaps look to get acquired by proton and get some integration going with those services? I’m no expert here, I just think that they have a lot of happy users, and there must be some way to figure this out financially.

            • Ephera@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              I’m not aware of any non-profit with staffing the size of Mozilla. The problem is that you need to be able to make money and to set it aside for bad times, so you don’t have to fire employees the moment the donations falter.

              The 501©(3) non-profit form of tax-exempt non-profit, which is what the Mozilla Foundation continues to be, is not allowed to do so. That’s why they opened up the for-profit Mozilla Corporation subsidiary that does most of the Firefox development.

              On the plus side, the only shareholder of the Mozilla Corporation is the Mozilla Foundation, which therefore essentially cannot accept any of the profit the MoCo might make.

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      The antitrust case is about Google and Apple, not Mozilla. It doesn’t mean the antitrust case will have any impact on Mozilla, because it’s not a major player, unlike Apple.

    • anachronist@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Mozilla and its murder/suicide pact with Google falling apart may be the best thing that could possibly happen to Firefox.

  • Lotarion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    uBO Lite works on Manifest v3 and it works quite well in my experience, so I kinda don’t get the whole manifest whining

    • time_fo_that@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      YouTube videos for some reason won’t load for me on Firefox. I switched to the Waterfox fork and it’s fine.

      • timestatic@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Google just maliciously makes their websites work way worse on Firefox. For YouTube I personally just use FreeTube on desktop and Tubular (A NewPipe fork) on Android so I never have to interact with that goddamn website

      • mrmanager@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Well, Google has been caught trying to make their sites slower / malfunctioning on Firefox. Usually they get away with it by saying it’s a mistake.

    • Anas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m back on Firefox now, but I did originally leave it because Edge had the speed. Not sure if that’s because it’s more optimized for Windows.

      • mrmanager@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I mean yeah, all these big tech companies are trying to make their products feel faster, because that’s the only space they can compete. When it comes to privacy, they all lose.

  • foreverandaday@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Manifest v3 was why I switched to FF a while ago - it was going to only be a matter of time even with the delays so I figured I should switch early. I still like how chrome looks a lot more and wish we had tab grouping, but google can take uBO from my cold, dead hands.

      • Matriks404@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Have you not heard the news? Mozilla essentially have become an advertising company by acquiring adtech start-up called Anonym. I think the only way to escape this bullshit is by installing privacy-enabled Firefox fork (such as LibreWolf) or to wait for an alternative web browser to rise up (like Ladybird or Servo) which has user freedom and privacy in its first priority, which is something that Mozilla doesn’t seem to care lately.

        • ColdWater@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          no I don’t, I have not keeping up with browser news lately after switched to Floorp, not sure if I still live long enough to see Ladybird or Servo officially released

  • VarosBounska@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I do not study in detail if this combination is necessary, but:

    • Firefox (of course)
    • Ghostery
    • Ublock Origin
    • Privacy Badger
    • Decentraleyes
    • Disconnect
  • Wisas62@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    There’s was only a very brief period that I would have considered Chrome a better option and that was the period when Chrome had a mobile app and FF didn’t. Other than that, I have never understood why you would use chrome. I know FF didn’t invent tab browsing, but definitely the first to do it successfully.

  • Kay_Angel@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    What does chromium-based browsers on pc have that Firefox doesn’t have? Like I don’t understand why people use Chrome instead of Firefox.

    • Baizey@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      One thing for danish people is the “online government id” (MitID) everyone has and needs to use for online purchases and logins to banks and various other things.

      It straight up only works on chrome for mobile :/

      • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I really wish Mozilla would focus on these missing bits and bobs like WebUSB and this one you mentioned instead of whatever the fuck it is that they’re doing now

  • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I use firefox, I mostly like it, but it still doesn’t support chromium style tab groups (no, that one extension is not similar), and its webgpu implementation also doesn’t work on most websites more than a year after Google made their version available by default

    • BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’ve been using Vivalid, they have ‘Workspaces’ which is different but in a way that was a pleasant surprise and kind of reminds me of older systems. Imagine working with one tab group at a time and the rest disappear when you’re not on that workspace.

    • dinozaur@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Not sure if this is “that one extension”, but I use Simple Tab Groups for Workspaces-like functionality, similar to Edge and Vivaldi. I know, it isn’t tab groups, but I use it similarly.

      • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Mozilla could definitely be putting their development time into the areas that the browser is actually behind in