• NoneYa@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Duh.

    It’s the classic thing that happens to all these movies and TV shows that purposely avoid the source material and brag about “we didn’t play the game or read the books” like that somehow is going to make the content better?

    • thefartographer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      3 months ago

      “I hate that thing that you love, so I convinced someone to pay me a million dollars to shit on it for you. Now pay me for my failures!

    • jqubed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      Offhand I can only think of one movie (and sequels) where “didn’t read the book” made the movie significantly better: The Bourne Identity. Those books really were awful!

    • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      Not only that, they probably would have been better off not using the original 4 playable characters since every game comes with a new set. Just make sure the side characters are done well and you keep the same feel as the games and it should have been an easy win

      • tb_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think the Halo show could’ve been much more interesting too if they focused on someone not the main character of the games.

        But no, gotta keep the most recognizable character

        • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Only if they read anything about the games or books. Leaving master chief out doesn’t fix the active contempt for the source material.