BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world to Canada@lemmy.ca · 3 months agoHe got double doubled.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square55fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageHe got double doubled.lemmy.worldBonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world to Canada@lemmy.ca · 3 months agomessage-square55fedilink
minus-squareBakedCatboy@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months agoUnless it’s a very weird special order display it’s probably still 60hz, that way the transitions between menu screens and animations look smooth.
minus-squareSwedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 months agoI’d be surprised if anyone manufactures something slower than 30hz at all
minus-squareArxCyberwolf@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 months agoEven the cheapest, most bottom-of-the-barrel LCD monitors from 15 years ago seem to still be 60. Matching the refresh rate to AC cycles per second makes sense.
Unless it’s a very weird special order display it’s probably still 60hz, that way the transitions between menu screens and animations look smooth.
I’d be surprised if anyone manufactures something slower than 30hz at all
Even the cheapest, most bottom-of-the-barrel LCD monitors from 15 years ago seem to still be 60. Matching the refresh rate to AC cycles per second makes sense.