Queensland’s Labor government turned heads last week with a bold new election promise. If returned to power, it would set up 12 state-owned petrol stations and limit fuel price rises to just five cents a litre on any given day.

The proposal certainly tapped into a pain point for Queenslanders – Brisbane topped national petrol price rankings last year.

But it was quickly met with a predictable pile on from opposing political commentators, industry bodies and some economists, attracting labels like “risky” and “dumb and stupid”.

Mark McKenzie, chief executive of the Australasian Convenience and Petroleum Marketers Association, called it a “wildly bizarre intervention” in the retail fuel market.

So is the Queensland premier really out of his mind, trying to win votes less than three months out from an election? Or is there actually some merit to this proposal?

  • 𝚝𝚛𝚔@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    But more often than not, Australia’s citizens found themselves little better off if at all. This turned out to be a common international experience for other countries privatising their utilities.

    Name one thing that’s been privatised that has resulted in any combination of better product, better service, or better price?

    • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      anything that benefits from/has potential for innovation really (things like launch vehicles), but public services and fully optimised industries whose only method of “improving efficiency” is enshittification should be owned by the people

    • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      rapid transit. chicagos el system the various lines were all independently owned but now they are part of one system with free transfers between them and even bus and train.

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Your comment couldn’t have been clearer, but 3 out of the 4 replies to it seem to have interpreted it to mean exactly the opposite of what it says.

      Either that, or those three comments are incredibly fucking dumb and their idea of “better product” is “more money for corporations”.

            • Zagorath@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              Ah yeah, your instance is defederated from Beehaw, which is where one of the three errors came from. (They said “water/sewer systems”.)

              • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                oh right, I forgot beehaw defederated from world and shit because of mass signups

                that was so long ago, do you know how beehaw is doing?

                • Zagorath@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  I couldn’t tell you how they’re doing with much confidence, but their communities all seem pretty good to me.

      • Dave.@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Telecom wasn’t exactly a shining example of a government run service though.

        Side note: Bring back the CES , privatised job search is an absolute fucking disaster.