BB84@mander.xyz to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months ago👁️ 🌹 💨 💨lemmy.mlimagemessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up11arrow-down1image👁️ 🌹 💨 💨lemmy.mlBB84@mander.xyz to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square28fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareitslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoFor a shift from about 700nm to 350nm: coming right at you at 0.6c It would also have a kinetic energy of about 1.1234 Petajoules, on the order of magnitude of the Tsar Bomba
minus-squareBB84@mander.xyzOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-22 months agoKinetic energy or total energy? Assuming the rose weight 10 grams I get that 1.12PJ total energy, but only 0.23PJ is kinetic.
minus-squareitslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoIn hindsight I was a bit generous with the weight, I assumed 50g
minus-squareFuck spez@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoOnly 10MT instead of 50 then?
minus-squareBB84@mander.xyzOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoOne ton of TNT is 1E9 calories which is 4 gigajoules. So 0.2 petajoules should be only 50 kilotons of TNT?
For a shift from about 700nm to 350nm: coming right at you at 0.6c
It would also have a kinetic energy of about 1.1234 Petajoules, on the order of magnitude of the Tsar Bomba
Kinetic energy or total energy? Assuming the rose weight 10 grams I get that 1.12PJ total energy, but only 0.23PJ is kinetic.
In hindsight I was a bit generous with the weight, I assumed 50g
chonk rose 😳
Only 10MT instead of 50 then?
One ton of TNT is 1E9 calories which is 4 gigajoules. So 0.2 petajoules should be only 50 kilotons of TNT?