Democrats when they see an opportunity for an own-goal: 🥵🥺
Ok, now they are clearly going too far with DEI hires/s
I don’t like this idea. But if it helps pull more votes from people who need permission to vote for her, I guess that’s what it takes. She needs to win bigly to really put the lie to the idea that it was stolen.
What if it pushes people to not vote?
Abraham Lincoln: Secretary of Ghosts
I accept your spookiest of terms.
Something something sit down with fascists, one more fascist now added to the table.
I want my president to have a diversity of fascist views
We got you covered!
Please no
Can america just go mask off and officially reveal that democrats and republicans are a single party already
Not at all surprising. Hell, Hillary Clinton beat Trump by 2.5 million votes in 2016 and she appointed him to the fucking presidency.
It’s an interesting thing. It soothes the fears of some people in the middle, upsets some in the left but also works against the agitation that she’s a rabid leftist. Not sure what the combined total effect would be, would she upset more people more or gain more from the middle.
If she can find an actual Republican and not a Magat or Libturd then it’s probably not a bad idea.
It would only be good if she appoints a Republican that was in the IRA
Maybe they could help Trump remodel his yacht
And now we will watch the momentum deflate like a cheap balloon. Liberals never cease to disappoint when it matters most. At least Tim Walz is cool.
Could have had an election after Biden stepped down. You could be voting for Tim as your next president. Just saying.
The media will eat this up. They love their John McCain warmongering and Mitt Romney deficit scalding. And they adore bipartisanship, particularly when it becomes an excuse to have Democrats in the White House signing Republican legislation.
The liberals will fawn all over Harris for bringing in more Republicans to Beat Trump. Winning the election is all that really matters. Policy is a distant secondary concern.
“would” as in, “I would, if I could find one that isn’t insane”, or “would” as in “I have a plan and already know who I’m giving the position to and what position it is”?
The interview is scheduled to air in full at 8 p.m. Thursday.
In that interview, Harris says if elected, she would name a Republican to serve in her cabinet, according to CNN.
I think the second one
I remember hee saying she didn’t have anyone specific in mind
Uhm actually, if you think about it it’s still harm reduction:
Think about how many Republicans Trump would appoint? Checkmate
I guess that’s unironically true but the US system with just one round of voting is a bit disappointing if you ask me. Makes it so that you’ll always have to go with one of two major candidates or the vote is basically wasted.
what the absolute fucking fuck is wrong with liberals that they can see and hear this shit and be like hmmm yes good
She’s going to put a Republican in charge of the Office of Blocking Abortion Reform and then people will just be like “uwu that’s just bipartisanship i guess”
Nah you appoint a sitting republican congressperson so their seat flips
Ok, then what is she going to do about the shitty disloyal rube she just hired to advise her on matters of national importance?
How about giving them a job in the cabinet that is irrelevant? This is best practice in lots of countries around the world
Could hear them out and then just not follow their advice
Because most of the people that claim they don’t approve will vote for her anyways.
That isn’t a defense of these shit libs? Idk what the point is
Oh, I wasn’t defending them. Did I miss the premise of your initial comment?
The “One party but we fight because it’s fun to RP” system is the only political system that can work in a country as big as the USA!