• DecentM@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not if they don’t track you. As far as I understand the fabled cookie law, you only need to have that notice if you’re using cookies in a way that’s not strictly necessary for the site’s functionality.

    • eendjes@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They do but lots of places make it a major hassle to set preferences. Like having “accept all” but rejecting has to be done one by one.

      • imgonnatrythis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah. That’s standard asshat practice now I feel like. There needs to be a GDRP2 that specifies these settings can only pop up if standardized user defaults saved within the browser settings are not present. It’s gotten way out of control.

      • derfl007@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m not a 100% on this, but from what i remember, this is technically also not allowed. Something about refusing has to be just as easy as accepting. What is unfortunately not regulated (i’d assume, since nobody does it) is a refuse all option for legitimate interest, so they can give you an option to opt out of all cookies but leave all the legitimate interest options on and you have to turn them off one by one. Worst part is you might not even see that they’re on if you just say refuse all instead of going to the settings

      • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tbh this is the reason I’m just using Firefox focus as default browser. Sure you can install your shit cookies, I’ll wipe them off after I’m done with your site