• GoodEye8@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          You mean the “at launch” part that the writer added to the article and isn’t a part of the official Saber statement? Something you’d know if you read the article past the introductory paragraph?

            • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Have you considered taking therapy? Because you’re literally making up shit to hate on a game, it’s not healthy.

              • KomfortablesKissen@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                I’m sharing my distrust in the communication to the players based on shit that happened in the past. But thanks for the personal attack disguised as concern.

                • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Actually I found it pretty disturbing that you’d make shit up just to throw a shade, so I’d consider the concern genuine even if poorly communicated.

                  Seriously, normal people don’t go “but what if they’re lying” any time something is said.

                • Lightor@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Well your stance is “don’t trust them” because they could lie. Then why listen to anything they say at all or engage in the convo?

                  • KomfortablesKissen@discuss.tchncs.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Interesting choices of questions. I don’t listen to what they say, I look at what they did. Hence my opinion.

                    Why do I engage in this convo? Not much to do on a Monday evening. Why do you engage in this convo?

            • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              We also learn in the FAQ that Easy Anti Cheat will be used on PC at launch

              I’m sorry, but what part of that says Denuvo or DRM?

            • Lightor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              The part the writer made up?

              You seem to not trust anyone except the person who wrote the article and just literally made up that part to add. That’s the only part you have faith in?

              • KomfortablesKissen@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Yes, the part the writer made up. Either they share the concerns that we see a repeat of the Helldivers 2 fun, or they reacted to an article earlier with that wording. Doesn’t matter, as I cannot see the future, I have to guess. I communicated that guess.

                You seem awfully aggressive to people that don’t share your view and dare to step into your line of sight. Do you always trust the official statements?

                • Lightor@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  No, but I trust what a person says themselves more than another person making assumptions based off what they said. Concerns and guesses are not valid when the person has said No very clearly. Unless your stance is “trust no one about anything” then this seems a little extreme.

                  You’re saying your guess has more validity than what they’re saying, and they have a very clear answer. So I’ll ask an equally silly question of you, do you always value your guess over what the sources say?

                  • KomfortablesKissen@discuss.tchncs.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    What? Maybe I don’t understand your phrasing correctly. Do you mean you DO trust the official statement? No shame in that, if that’s what you want to say. Or do you want to say that you only trust the official statement if it’s the first thing you hear about something? Then it gets confusing and I don’t think you mean that.

                    Concerns and guesses about a persons intentions are indeed valid. I’d rather not let people punch me to learn their intentions, I’d rather keep my distance regardless of an innocent face. Metaphorically speaking. Thanks to goodeye8 I read more about the company and their stances and now think it’s valid what they say. I will still be distrusting of companies, but maybe I’ll do more research before commenting. Maybe.

                    Also, my guess always has precedence over anything other people state. I rather trust my eye rather than someone else’s. Again, metaphor. But my guess can be (…steered? Guided? Influenced?) when given more proof from different sources.

      • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        “Will this game have DRM?”

        “No.”

        “Why are you overly specific?”