• Carrolade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    131
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    4 months ago

    It is admittedly a little ironic that the Greens’ existence has likely resulted in the rollback of environmental regulations. It’s almost like their top leadership post-Nader is just accelerationist in philosophy.

    • K1nsey6@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      117
      ·
      4 months ago

      I trust Greens to protect environmental policies much more than the DNC, they would follow through with their promises and not just spout populous bullshit while doing nothing.

      • Ledivin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        125
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s great that they can pretend that’d be the case while standing literally no possible risk of being elected. It’s easy to stand by your morals when there is no risk at all of having to defend or enact them.

        • K1nsey6@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          62
          ·
          4 months ago

          I would rather vote for what I want in government and not get it than to vote against something and get it anyway. Democrats voted against Trump and his policies in 2020 and got someone keeping his worst policies, and now want someone even further to the right than Biden was.

          • otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            47
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            4 months ago

            This is a completely infantile concept. You wanna throw a tantrum for something you want, regardless of how asinine or unlikely it is, and despite all facts pointing to its irrationality? smdh. 🖕🏽

            • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              50
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Look at their comment history. Joined almost exactly a year ago, had maybe 5-ish comments. Then a month ago, Harris replaces Biden giving Democrats a solid chance at the presidency, and suddenly they now have around 200 comments, every single one of them being in /c/politics and promoting Jill Stein and conflating Kamala Harris with Republicans (e.g. calling her voters “BlueMAGA”).

              I don’t care if it’s their intended goal or not; the actual effect of their rhetoric is “I want enough leftists to throw their vote away to a Russian plant so the US elects a fascist into office.”

            • K1nsey6@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              41
              ·
              4 months ago

              Voting for the same people and policies and expecting a different result is the infantile concept

              • bobburger@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                26
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                4 months ago

                So voting for a random third party and changing absolutely nothing is an infantile concept?

              • dezmd@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                17
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                4 months ago

                That’s the exact argument against voting for Green party candidates.

                • K1nsey6@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Just to be clear how has voting for the same people expecting different results changed literally anything? We are having the exact same conversations about wages, housing, employment, healthcare education, etc. that they were having during the civil rights movements, that they were having during the Great depression. If we’re continuing to have the exact same conversations, things are not getting any better

      • OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        63
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        4 months ago

        Then they should join the DNC and reform it from the inside. Join the progressive movement. Shift the Dems back to the center-left. All they’re doing as a separate party is siphon votes away from DNC, which gives an advantage to the RNC, which erodes their own efforts to push green policies.

        • K1nsey6@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          49
          ·
          4 months ago

          Reforming from the inside is liberal fantasy. The party is operating as designed and they will not allow anyone to vote away their power.

          The solution is to abandon the DNC and support an actual party representing the working class. 3rd party’s do not siphon away votes because we wouldn’t vote for your party if there were no 3rd option on the ballot. We are not democrats so we would not vote for a democrat

          • draneceusrex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            I voted 3rd party as a protest vote in a few elections up to 2012, but I recognized that it was exactly that. I also have lived through a term with Trump as president. Because of Trump, women in this country have lost their reproductive rights. That is just the most obvious example of how he has hurt this country. The fact you are still not recognizing that Trump regaining the presidency is an existential threat to democracy is exasperating, especially when the majority of Democrats are allies to a good portion of the Green Party’s so-called platform. Ultimately, you need to face facts: Stein is clearly a shill for Putin and a spoiler for the election.

            • K1nsey6@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              29
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              The protest vote is a vote of capitulation for the duopoly. A 3rd party vote cast out of conviction is a vote for democracy. Yours is based on fear and irrationality.

              Dems are only mouth pieces for progress, all talk, zero action. Rince and repeat every election cycle.

              • draneceusrex@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                16
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                4 months ago

                I am sure your moral high ground will comfort you when Trump opens concentration camps in our own country for the undocumented (among others), and we literally live in A Handmaiden’s Tale. When the “dictator on day one” throws away our constitution and strips our lives away, remember how stoic you are! It could be the last election your vote is even counted for the Green Party, so I hope you are proud of your convictions!

                The Dems aren’t perfect, but they aren’t comprised by Russia like both The Green Party and the GOP. Yes, I’m scared. I saw what happened last time. Why the hell aren’t you?

                • K1nsey6@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  15
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Like a rabbit in the open terrified of the wind. Everything you claimed is hyperbole

                  • revelrous@sopuli.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    Riiiiight. They’ll never overturn Roe, that’s got judicial standing. It’s downright hysterical to suggest such a thing could happen. It’s not like we could live in an America with a 3rd of American women under an abortion ban right, and a national ban looming? RIGHT? And it would be unthinkable to intentionally and irrevocably separate families right? Not for any procedural necessity, but just to brutally traumatize anyone who tries to make a crossing. That’d be a pretty fucked up inhuman policy RIGHT?

          • BaldManGoomba@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            In a first past the post democracy there is no 3rd party. There is only the thing that is slightly better. Who is better in everything you want? Trump or Harris? If you say something else. But Harris is Closer to what you want and you choose the 3rd option you are choosing to help Trump win in your state. You choosing 3rd party is one less vote Trump has to win. If you want the green parties policies Trump is the furthest away from it. The time to move the party was during the primary. Now we have to vote for the furthest left thing that has the strongest chance of winning OR we get the right wing thing. Potentially never getting a chance to vote again if you listen to Trump.

            The most minuscule way protest votes are possible is if you live in an overwhelmingly Blue state and you know Harris will win sure vote 3rd party but in Georgia when 11,000 people decided the outcome we can’t risk a movement of voting 3rd party. Title 9 , abortion, climate change belief in government, federal agencies, EPA, postal service, FTC, SEC, redistricting to make fair election maps for the senate and congress, manufacturing, and so much more is on the chopping block for Trump and Republicans let alone more supreme court and federal judges

            • K1nsey6@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              4 months ago

              That sounds like a bunch of lesser evil bullshit, lesser evil doesnt exist. That’s bullshit liberals tell themselves to make them feel better for not having the proverbial balls to vote their conscience and do what’s right. It prolongs the suffering of marginalized because they prefer a slow agonizing death over a quick one. There is also the choice of no death. 50.yesrs of liberal ‘lesser evil’ has grown into an enormous one that they can’t control. This is the bed they made and want non Democrats to help them out of the mess they created. Good luck

      • Aphelion@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        With what power? If the Green party continues doing nothing, gaining no local seats, no congressional seats, then how are they protecting environmental policy?

          • K1nsey6@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            24
            ·
            4 months ago

            Spoiler doesn’t exist, we would never vote for your politicians even if they were the only ones on the ballot. If it wasnt for Hillary and Co Trump would have never won. The person YOU supported gave us trump.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        I don’t. They’re not a serious party, and due to how shitty our electoral process is, all they do at the end of the day is strip votes from the Democratic candidates.

        I wish that wasn’t how our elections worked, but it is. Pretending that’s not the case is a self-defeating strategy.

        • K1nsey6@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          30
          ·
          4 months ago

          They’re not stripping away votes that they are not entitled to, that’s not how things work. We wouldn’t vote for your shitty candidates if they were the only one on the ballot.

          • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            Tell me you don’t understand the tactical implications of FPTP without telling me you don’t understand the tactical implications of FPTP

            This isn’t about “my shitty candidates”. Stop being obtuse. You are intentionally confusing the issue and misleading people.

            • K1nsey6@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              18
              ·
              4 months ago

              There is no confusion, if liberals were so concerned about my vote and getting FPTP then they should abandon their party and support 3rd options.

              Yes, they are shitty candidates. When their only policy is ‘joy’ and people are falling for it, they are shitty

              • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                4 months ago

                Good luck convincing 70+ million people to vote for your shitty Russian stooge.

                their only policy is ‘joy’

                Nice talking point, but it’s a little out of date at this point. You should ask for the updated list.

          • dezmd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            Nobody is entitled to any votes.

            We wouldn’t vote for either of your shitty Putin compromised candidates even if they were they were the only ones on the ballot.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        41
        ·
        4 months ago

        I trust Greens to protect environmental policies much more than the DNC

        Idk if I “trust” them to do anything, per say. I’ve never seen a Green candidate assume office.

        But the argument I see from Democrats is that you have to vote for the liberal guy accepting kickbacks and sinecures from the O&G industry or you’ll get the conservative guy accepting kickbacks and sinecures from the O&G industry, instead. My current crop of Dem-aligned city and state officials are hugely in the tank for the petroleum industry, they’ve done little more than greenwashing when it comes to waste management and sustainable development in their districts, and they are openly hostile to environmental groups in town.

        If the Green Party becomes the refuge for people disillusioned with the O&G aligned local democrats, who is to blame for that? Insidious Machiavellian Jill Stein? Nefarious GOP ratfvckers? The shadowy hand of Vladimir Putin? Or the Democrats who consistently fail to deliver mass transit, waste recycling, and environmental regulation, even within their base strongholds?

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            They do have a handful of municipal offices scattered nationwide. Do they have any state legislative offices?

            I’m not entirely clear on the policy consequences of these wins, though. Are they just rebranded Dems, or do they have a real Sanders/Ventura-esque impact on how these governments operate?

          • TheFonz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            In a country of 300 million people. You calling this some kind of achievement?