• cqst@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    There will be no improvement with browsers until the introduction of one with a strong copyleft license.

      • unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Chromium is fully entrenched. “strong copyleft”? Even Microsoft bent to the will of Chromium. And Firefox is just a silly thing where people like me hang on

        • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          If I remember correctly it’s under a copy left license which makes sense given it’s ultimately a derivative of KHTML.

          • unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            KHTML is a discontinued browser engine that was developed by the KDE project. It originated as the engine of the Konqueror browser in the late 1990s, but active development ceased in 2016. It was officially discontinued in 2023. Built on the KParts framework and written in C++, KHTML had relatively good support for Web standards during its prime. Engines forked from KHTML are used by most of the browsers that are widely used today, including WebKit and Blink

    • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I’m curious, how would copyleft license improve the quality of browser development? That is really about funding and management.