• FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    “This is a complex subject with a lot of subtleties. We have to choose the right words to make sure we avoid misunderstandings. Any sufficiently developed topic has a language all its own.”

  • Naz@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    It gets worse the more deviations you get away from the mean:

    Scientists and other academics who often pride themselves on their rhetoric act in peculiar ways when they’re challenged on their assumptions with sources.

    Normally, you’d expect the open-minded to be like: “Wow, that’s something I hadn’t considered! Thanks for expanding my intellectual horizons!”

    Instead its: “You completely invalidated my work, you fuckwit! We’re going to lose funding!

    Always be kind to everyone you meet. C:

  • unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Is been literally decades, so I’m forgetting, but that particular case had some arguments regarding the turgid state of penises. I read a brief from this case, because my relative was like, this is silly, you’ll enjoy it

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    I never pontificated like that, but you’re utterly correct.

    I find it inconceivable that when I stirred from my bedchamber this morning, that I would find myself with an appeal to my senses that would brighten my day.

    obliged

  • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    I had a political conversation with a right-wing co-worker a while back, and he generally operated in good faith, but he got flustered and tried to do the “why do you use big/pretentious words” scold on me, and he did not handle it well when I responded “I guess home school and Liberty University didn’t land you with much of a vocabulary”.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      I just don’t know normal words.

      As an ESL, I felt that in my bones. One time my boss asked me to get the pail to water the plants and my only exposure to that word had been the wailmer pail from the Pokémon games that I misremembered as a “whalepail”. It was awkward trying to explain why I was stumped.

  • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s interesting, they used to think that having a big vocabulary or knowing multiple languages delayed having Alzheimer’s. It turns out that family often first become aware that a person is developing Alzheimer’s because the person starts regularly forgetting common words, but people with big vocabularies can come up with alternatives when they can’t remember one, so their family doesn’t recognize it as early. When those people are diagnosed, they end up being further along.

  • toynbee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    There was a Basic Instructions comic about exactly this, but unfortunately the only thing I can remember about it is that the protagonist describes someone’s hair as “turgid” and “basic instructions turgid hair” isn’t getting many relevant results.

    Also, is “chariots chariots” related to the rest of the post or am I just oblivious?

    edit: s/coming/comic

    • unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Reminds me of my lawyer relative talking about defending a case involving undercover cops and strip clubs. “Turgid” is a legal concept, I guess. Honestly I think that’s very stupid.

      • toynbee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Apparently it can mean “excessively embellished in style or language,” so I guess if you were to describe a legally contested situation in a … Turgid manner, it could distort any case made based on your testimony? IANAL, so that’s just a wild swing at the appropriate application based on one web search.

        Preemptive aside: I’ve seen lots of jokes made, so for anyone not familiar, IANAL is neither sexual nor any kind of innuendo or entendre.

  • _number8_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    i like when people use big words cause then i can learn a new word. it’s nice knowing words to say stuff with

  • Infynis@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I write a lot of fantasy, and that definitely affects my practical vocabulary. I don’t think the specificity is needless though, especially in English, this Frankenstein of cognates and loaner words. You have so many options because the human experience is so diverse and multifaceted. Clarity helps, and it makes language more beautiful, something we should all strive for