… Why? His content can be enjoyable, but I’m not sure it relates here.
… Why? His content can be enjoyable, but I’m not sure it relates here.
Little Johnny was a scientist, little Johnny is no more …
This basically happened in an early (possibly the first?) episode of Community. Likely that was inspired by something that happened in real life, but it would not be surprising if the story in the image was inspired by Community.
Anyone who values you less because of your appearance is not worth your consideration.
This does discount physical and medical consequences, which are absolutely worth noting, but whether others notice your missing tooth should not be an issue.
It makes sense and is understandable that you would feel sensitive about it, including wanting the tooth back, but its absence does not reflect upon you as a person and ideally you don’t feel bad about it.
This isn’t meant to dismiss trauma, but help with any insecurity. Personally, I’d rather hear what you have to say rather than whether you can chew adequately.
Hopefully you get your tooth back if its absence is causing you stress.
edit: I don’t mean to invalidate any of your feelings on the subject. I don’t have any visibly missing teeth, but my mother very prominently did. If anything I said above isn’t accurate, I certainly yield to you, but I hope that something above helps.
Plus it puts on a Santa hat around Christmas.
I can’t say for certain, but I think that might be by design.
“I’ve heard your name.” “Most people have; it’s also a noun.”
I appreciate this reference. (Yellow)
I don’t think there was anyone around at the time who suggested that it was a good idea, heh.
At the time, my mom - his wife of 27 years - had recently died and I think he was trying to find himself again. Unicycles with ski poles weren’t the only odd decisions he made.
My then-sixtyish year old dad bought a unicycle. He also bought a pair of ski poles to help him balance while learning to ride it by traveling up and down a long hallway in his home.
This doesn’t really add anything to the conversation, but I’ve always found it funny and rarely had an opportunity to share it.
It seems very likely that this drop-down menu was not populated by one person, or perhaps was even populated by multiple databases written by very different people with highly disparate levels of grammar knowledge - maybe even different first languages.
Or someone thought it was funny, like you said. I’m not here to judge.
I mean, possibly.
Can’t day for Tobey, but apparently Daniel Radcliffe did deliberately do something very similar to stymie paparazzi.
I’m pretty sure there’s nothing in this image that means anything to me.
Except the first username … Unfortunately.
Never before have I considered the idea of “licking their own brains” and I thank you for bringing that thought into my life.
With self hosted email and at least Proton Mail (and probably other paid solutions), you can set up a “catch all” address. With that, any non existing email gets redirected to one; for me, I have spam@domain.com so, while myname@domain.com goes to my inbox, thisaddressisinvalid@domain.com and, I don’t know, walmart@domain.com both go to spam@domain.com. I don’t need an individual entry for every alias and I can specifically block any address that’s particularly spammy or compromised.
I hear that you can have a similar setup with something called SimpleLogin, but I’ve never tried that.
In case this question is being asked sincerely, and not yet having read the article, I suspect the title means a 3°C rise in average temperature worldwide.
But it makes so much sense!
I didn’t know post10 used Lemmy.
In the days of old when knights were bold and toilet paper wasn’t invented, they’d wipe their ass with a piece of grass and walk away contented.