• LalSalaamComrade@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    I think you should also highlight how it is different from China’s Alipay or similar payment vendor system in Europe and the US - it is a unified payment system, there is little to no fee for transaction, and you’re not locked to a eco-system, like Apple, or PayPal. But it is absolutely horrible when it comes to privacy.

    • AusatKeyboardPremi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Can you expand on why UPI is horrible when it comes to privacy when compared to the other options you have mentioned?

      I would not be doing any sort of digital transactions if I am worried about privacy as I don’t think one is better than the other in this matter. It would be naive to think so otherwise.

    • red@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      the difference is this is unified and government maintained, alipay or any payment vendor’s you have to use their apps, and you can only send money to people who have accounts in their apps, here it’s maintained by government no need to make any account anywhere, just direct bank to bank transfer with just phone number and QR code. and more importantly no transaction fees

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      But it is absolutely horrible when it comes to privacy.

      Reading OPs description, I did wonder.

      • red@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        it is indeed horrible, I’m pretty sure one of the biggest motivation to push for digital transactions was to track easily and tax easily