• BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    America: our mail system is. USPS processes 23.5 million packages per day, and processes and delivers 318 million pieces of mail every day, to every single household in America, 6 days per week (7 days per week for packages).

    They will throw mail sacks onto the backs of donkeys and trek them down into the Grand Canyon to deliver to tribes down there. They will deliver by bike, plane, boat, truck, car, etc. Hell, name any other organization where you could hand someone a letter and $0.62 and ask them to take it to Alaska for you, and they’d say no problem.

    “Post” roads in the U.S. are named as such because they were roads built specifically for the movement of “post” across the country, and people have even argued that USPS (then the Postal Service) created the layout of the country as we know it.

    And despite what many may think or know, USPS is incredibly efficient when it comes to mail and delivery compared to other countries. I remember them telling us during our orientation (I used to be a mail carrier) that back around 2013, representatives from USPS were actually flown to Germany to teach and help them start delivering 6-days per week. USPS taught Germany how to be more efficient at something 😂

    • HipsterTenZero@dormi.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      It was like a dark an unspeakable revelation out of a cosmic horror novel when I learned that some freaks in the states concocted deep fried butter.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        IIRC somewhere over here someone offers Deep Fried Coke. I don’t know how one deep fries soda, and at this point I don’t want to ask.

        • Zron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          It’s just a ball of plane batter with coke mixed in.

          Look up a recipe for fritters made with flour, replace some liquid with coke syrup. Easy.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    I live in a 10 million people European country which is the leading cork producer in the work.

    Also the first European country to explicitly decriminalise drug consumption.

    Those two things are unrelated.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    US here. I don’t think we get enough credit for our anti-smoking culture, and given that Hollywood is a major culture driver…

    Even in my poor little town, where the broke and uneducated smoke more, it’s getting to be where I’m a little taken aback when I see someone smoking in public.

    All this coming from a guy that smoked for 20+ years. The culture shift has been dramatic and I hope we’re exporting it.

    • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      For what it’s worth, I’ve also noticed the same thing where I live in Tennessee. Smoked for 21 years (from 11 to 32), and while there are still a ton of smokers in my little hick town, it’s much less than before.

    • ddplf@szmer.info
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      I think I’d be more happy with my compatriots abusing cigarettes and not drugs. US has massive narcotic consumption problem and cigarettes I’d call the mildest of this subgroup.

        • ddplf@szmer.info
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          Wait, you mean to say that strong drugs are less harmful than cigs and tame drugs?

          And that alcohol is in the same category as cocaine or meth?

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            The other way around and yes, pretty much. I mean it’s probably a bit below cocaine but like yeah, that shit is bad.

            • ddplf@szmer.info
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              8 days ago

              First thing - you really confused the signs

              Second thing - you really have no idea what you’re talking about.

              Alcohol is definitely a menace to society, but the strongest alcohol a man can drink (like absinth, not methanol) will be much less devastating than cocaine or meth after one dose. Not to mention some other vile drugs like the russian krokodil.

    • Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Also US, we’re definitely not exhibiting an “anti smoking” culture. I think you’re confusing what you’re exposed to to what is really going on in the world. It’s important to recognize the limitations of your perspective, and not confuse them for a national trend

    • digdilem@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      The UK has seen a stratospheric drop too. Banned from all non-private indoor spaces, taxed through the roof. At least in the South, it’s rare to see or even smell someone smoking now, even on TV. Although in some cities it’s just as likely to smell cannabis as tobacco.

      I don’t think you’re “exporting it” though - it’s not an American initiative. This was a pretty universal shift of “why the fuck do we do this stupid shit?”

    • LalSalaamComrade@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      There are plenty of countries doing better in smoking in terms of relative change, like Peru, Sierra Leone, Tanzania, Uganda and Norway, etc - there’s a whole lot of them. The net drop in smoking is about 32% in the US, compared to these countries, which have a much higher drop - indicating the effectiveness of their anti-smoking campaign.

      In fact, countries like Ghana, Nigeria, Panama, Ethiopia and Turkmenistan are doing really well, with less than 6% of the population smoking.

      • jaybone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        I’m a smoker in the US. It seems like a hell of a lot less than 6% of people here smoke. I don’t think I have a single family member or friend who still smokes. Feels like it’s just me.

    • Enoril@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      When does it started ? Do you have law prohibiting smoking in public place like restaurant, transports, nigth club, office, etc ?

      Because, while it’s true we see less smokers in movies, it’s the first time i hear US having a anti-smoking culture… Note that I include drugs like weed in the smoking culture and we heard a lot from it recently. And only from US.

      On my country, since the 90’, it’s forbiden to smoke in public place, in the office, etc. They also increased a lot it’s price bia taxes, put labels on the packaging and the amount of smokers reduced a lot since. But hollywood still represent us as smoker ^^

      • Taser@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        When does it started ? Do you have law prohibiting smoking in public place like restaurant, transports, nigth club, office, etc ?

        Pretty much this. From the late 80’s more and more smoking bans were put into place. Public buildings, any private business, public transport, etc.

        It’s at the point now that the only places you can smoke are your own house (even the apartment buildings I’ve been to have no smoking rules. Like, even in your own apartment) or outside (as long as it’s x feet/meters away from a building’s entrance).

  • aMockTie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Not from the US but currently living here. I would say the Disability Act is the gold standard worldwide. The amount of consideration for people with a variety of disabilities that almost universally applies is exceptionally amazing. It’s kind of shocking to see the dedication to adhering to that law while otherwise abandoning that portion of the population (e.g. Healthcare, SSDI, etc.).

      • vortic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        They currently live in the US. So, whether they properly answered your prompt seems to depend on your definition of “your country”.

    • Habahnow@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yeah it was surprisingly jarring going to Europe and seeing places that were completely inaccessible by wheel chair. I have never used a wheel chair in my life but I know there’s bars in my area that have mini elevators for peole on wheel chairs to access the lower level that’s only like 4 steps down.

      • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Hold on, I’ll phone the Romans and ask them why they didn’t make the pont du Gard wheelchair accessible

    • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Incidentally it’s a lot easier to take legal action against a business that violates the ADA than to take action against a government that insists on defunding programs like that.

      • Clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Right, there are people and lawfirms that make all their money going around measuring doorway widths and bathroom counter heights and stuff, because the person who raises the complaint gets a reward… Sort of like bounty hunters?

    • magnetosphere@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      I’ve lived in America all my life. Thank you for this interesting outside perspective. I never would have guessed that the ADA is held in such high regard!

      • RebekahWSD@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        The ada is amazing. My husband grew up just as it was being put into place and remembers the protests (to get it, not against it). Without it, things are much more difficult. I know there will be handicapped parking, and cutins on sidewalks and bathrooms and stuff wherever we go without having to look it up.

  • DrunkenPirate@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Germany: We moved our power creation from 60% coal and atom-driven to 60% wind and solar-driven in the last 6 years. This change is fundamental and can’t be reversed. We stopped our atom plants and have a plan out of coal. Even though our geography isn’t in favor for renewables, our country is dedicated in becoming carbon neutral. This is supported by most of the population and industry. (Yes renewables are cheaper than coal, gas, and atom)

    Still open is the transition of heat and cars to electricity. Rather an emotional debate - Germans are car-crazy. The car discussion is similar to the gun debate in the US.

      • DrunkenPirate@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Try to dismantle a nuclear plant. It costs tons of money and time. Ask the people at Nagasaki or Tschernobyl.

        Dismantle a coal power plant takes time, but one can reuse the iron and such. All the open mining fields and mining tunnels are the problem. In Western Germany, there are areas where house crack or cars fall down sudden openings caused by old mining tunnels.

        Try to dismantle at wind mill or solar fields. It’s a quest of days and some bucks.

        I prefer the easy way of living. So, my favorite are renewables.

        • Dragon "Rider"(drag)@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          You dismantled your plants because dismantling your plants is hard? 🤔 That seems backwards. Why not upgrade? Then you never have to dismantle. Keep it alive forever.

          • AgentRocket@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            Upgrading would have cost way more. one of the reasons atom power is so expensive (without government subsidies) is the cost of the plants which needs to be recouped as well as the price of the uranium. not to mention that we haven’t found a suitable place to store the waste for those thousands of years until it’s harmless.

        • Dr. Quadragon ❌@mastodon.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          @DrunkenPirate

          > I prefer the easy way of living.

          There is no such thing as “easy way of living”.

          Renewables suck at energy density, predictability and control.

          Nuclear gives you all three.

          Also, look into the solar panel manufacturing costs to the environment.

          Of course, renewables are a must. But by dismantling nuclear you kneecapped yourselves, guys, big time.

          @dragonfucker

      • Ross_audio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Not when you consider the maintenance costs of the plants they closed. Basically of them were beyond original design life.

        • rautapekoni@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          I guess, but the Energiewende must’ve been really expensive already and by my best guesstimation those upkeep costs would have been small in comparison. What irks me more about the situation is wrapping shutting down the nuclear plants in a guise of green policy while simultaneously supporting a huge coal industry. Very happy for all the renewables, still.

    • klangcola@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Sudden culture shock from a Norwegian:

      Still open is the transition of heat and cars to electricity…

      Almost all electricity used by Norwegian homes goes towards heating (including cooking and hot water), and charging cars. So counting heating separate from electricity suddenly makes the electric transition sound less impressive. (And the transition away from nuclear more baffling). It’s still impressive to see Germany really follow through on renewables though. 60% renewable electricity is still a lot

      Is there a plan to transition away from burning fossil fuels for heating?

      • freebee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        German homes are relatively okay insulated. Very remote: burn wood or some sort of wood pellet stuff. Not clean, but it is local and renewable. Less remote: heat pumps, runs on electricity. Cities: many are planning/extending heat nets, those can be partially powered by left over heat from industry. And import nuclear electricity from France in winter I guess!

    • Habahnow@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      By atom, do you mean nuclear energy? Why did you stop the nuclear plant?, assuming that’s what you’re referring to.

      How does this relate to Germany relying using natural gas from Russia, before their invasion of Ukraine? My understanding was that Germany had energy issues at the offset, which I wouldn’t expect considering how much renewavles you use

      • Ptsf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Honestly, despite all of nuclears many benefits, there’s still no good action plan for the significant amounts of substantially dangerous waste it leaves around. Hard to figure out a storage plan for an invisible poison seeping from a rock for the next 50,000 years.

        • Habahnow@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          Does it actually seep? my understanding of chemical waste is: that it doesn’t generate a lot (the US has about a foot ball fields worth from all of our nuclear power plants in our total history, so nearly 70 years), and that they placed is secure, not leaking containers. You’re right that it will eventually be a problem, but probably a problem that we will have to deal with later than our current climate crisis. An argument could be made that maybe new nuclear plants shouldn’t be made, but if we have some up and running, that’s cheap energy that generates little carbon.

          • Ptsf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            I pasted some links, but the DoE says groundwater will most likely be contaminated. Depends on who you trust and how willing you are to suffer radioactive contamination. Granted, it’s probably a better risk profile than say… Coal… But that doesn’t change the fact we have no good longterm plan to store any amount of radioactive waste, and if history is your teacher, a plan will most likely not come to fruition.

          • DrunkenPirate@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            but if we have some up and running, that’s cheap energy that generates little carbon.

            That is the great misunderstanding of nuclear. It isn’t cheap. It’s supported massively by tax money. In France with all its big nuclear plants for example, the power company went bankrupt. Nuclear is too expensive to run. The government took over the operations.

            In Germany, the power companies refused to prolong the operations of nuclear at the beginning of Russian invasion. It was too expensive for them.

            The only advantage that nuclear has, is that it’s independent of weather and doesn’t emit carbon. The drawback is the costs, inflexibility (always on), and reliance on cool water (which was an issue in France). That’s why MS, Amazon and all put there eggs into this basket for AI power - they shit money.

      • ddplf@szmer.info
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Germans have massive phobia on atom, fueled mostly by conservatives. Also worth of note - the conservatives are for the most part either literal neonazis or pro-russian or both.

          • ddplf@szmer.info
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            Deleted my comment because I was wrong, AfD does not lobby against nuclear plants.

            However it does not change the fact that they are neonazi Putin enthusiasts

            • superkret@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 days ago

              But they aren’t conservative, either.
              And the conservatives weren’t the ones lobbying against nuclear. That was Merkel, who was a centrist.

  • qevlarr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Dutch traffic infrastructure. It’s incredibly safe, promotes walking, bicycling and public transport, well maintained and easy to understand. There’s a reason the largest Youtube channel on urban planning center around the Netherlands experience (and how other places could learn): https://youtube.com/@notjustbikes

  • red@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    India: what India does wayyy better than others is digital payments. we have what is called UPI this is a open payments interface made by government (rbi) but their APIs can be used by any bank’s and any verified third party apps, and all you need to use UPI is just a bank account that’s it, and with this we can send money to any bank account through any other bank account with just phone number or QR code, the reciver and sender don’t even have to use same app because the backend is same for all, i just have to search for their number and send money, or i just have to scan QR code and send money, and it happens instantly with no minimum limit, this is so widely used that pretty much any shopkeeper keeps a UPI qr code even the ones in smallest and remote villages. infact i dony think I used single rupee in cash since like last 3 years, i don’t carry cash anywhere either, this is integrated with popular apps too like uber online food ordering apps , Netflix and basically any app that needs payment. upi is pretty much only reason why India has the most digital transaction in world even more than China and it’s not even close.

    also public digital infrastructure, pretty much anything government related is done digitally, like our id cards, driving licence, income certificate, and even high school and degree certificate is digitised, infact even our college credits is digitised, like my college credits will be automatically added so it will be seamless to change college in between my degree, and ofc all this is verified cryptographically with an app, so it’s not just one pdf which can be forged or something. and recently a law was passed which made the cryptographically verified digital documents legally same thing as physical one’s, so now if you have a phone with the app installed ( government made app that store’s and verifies documents) and if you have all your documents in that app you are good to go anywhere. this is more than just concinence of not having to carry physical documents because now we can make bank accounts completely online because verification can be done through their APIs and cryptographically. and yeah it was super useful in covid times because we could do appointment for vaccination online in the app and we could get covid certificate digitally.

      • red@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        is it as simple as " download an app and sign in through phone number and bank account is automatically detected and you are good to go" ans also there is no transaction fees

        • slazer2au@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          That’s way more convoluted than here.

          Our banking apps have a QR scanner in them so no need for new apps or new accounts.

          • red@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            banking apps have upi too, even in banking apps you have to sign in with id and password and such with upi specific apps you don’t even have to do that, it’s just that you have more freedom here, the thing is any app can have it

    • xavier_berthiaume@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Wow that’s really impressive! I’m used to having a great online platform to transfer money, but having government issued documents be digitized is a step beyond what we have here!

    • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      I’m curious, how does that work for people from remote villages? India still have a pretty large population who live traditional lifestyles with limited access to the Internet, don’t y’all? Do they have the option of more traditional paper documents, or do they have to find a computer somewhere to use for certain things?

      • red@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        even people from less developed places use digital stuff, you don’t need computer you only need a phone to use everything, mobile data is super cheap in india (3usd per month for 2gb per day), and smartphones are super cheap too, even people who don’t have access to electricity use digital payments. infact this was possible only because of cheap internet and many indians are comfortable with tech somehow. and connectivity is really good pretty much 100% of country get’s fast 4g and nearly 80% has 5g

    • M600@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      We use qr-based payments where I live too. I been the qr-codes have to work on all payment platforms which is super convenient.

      The only minor gripe is that they charge a small transfer fee if going between banks. Do you have that fee?

      • red@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        there is no fee, the servers and bandwidth cost taken from taxpayers money basically

    • digdilem@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      India has the BRO too.

      Watching a guy called Joe Ryan on Youtube at the mo, who’s riding a motorbike around the Himalayas. The BRO are building roads there at an incredible rate in the most impossible landscape. I’m genuinely amazed at the scale and adaptability of them and how much they’re doing right now.

      This is literally changing the lives of those who live in the area, although I do wonder how much this will trigger tourism and change everything as it has elsewhere. But still, those guys can build roads.

    • LalSalaamComrade@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      I think you should also highlight how it is different from China’s Alipay or similar payment vendor system in Europe and the US - it is a unified payment system, there is little to no fee for transaction, and you’re not locked to a eco-system, like Apple, or PayPal. But it is absolutely horrible when it comes to privacy.

      • AusatKeyboardPremi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Can you expand on why UPI is horrible when it comes to privacy when compared to the other options you have mentioned?

        I would not be doing any sort of digital transactions if I am worried about privacy as I don’t think one is better than the other in this matter. It would be naive to think so otherwise.

      • red@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        the difference is this is unified and government maintained, alipay or any payment vendor’s you have to use their apps, and you can only send money to people who have accounts in their apps, here it’s maintained by government no need to make any account anywhere, just direct bank to bank transfer with just phone number and QR code. and more importantly no transaction fees

      • wewbull@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        But it is absolutely horrible when it comes to privacy.

        Reading OPs description, I did wonder.

        • red@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          it is indeed horrible, I’m pretty sure one of the biggest motivation to push for digital transactions was to track easily and tax easily

  • 0485@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Recycling. In Sweden e recycle so much that we have to buy trash from other countries!

    • VonReposti@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      In Denmark our district heating is so great that we have to import trash to burn at our Combined Heat and Power plants. Bit ironic given that we’re also a market leader on windmills that are supposed to replace plants.

  • nis@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Denmark: Hygge, apparently. But a lot of writers are working hard to make money off of getting a lot of people to know about it.

  • superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Germany. Bicycle parts.
    Sure, the market leaders are Shimano from Japan and Sram from the US.
    But look into the high-priced niches and there’s:

    • Bosch, market leader for e-bike motors
    • Schwalbe, market leader for bicycle tires
    • Rohloff, makes the best gear hubs in the world
    • Pinion, makes the best bottom bracket gearbox in the world
    • SON, makes the best hub dynamos in the world
    • Busch & Müller, makes the best bicycle lights in the world
    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Why do e bikes even have fenders? I’m not going off-road with the thing, and I cannot imagine trying to ride one where it actually rains, rather than pretends to rain.

    • AdNecrias@lemmy.pt
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      A year ago I was surprised how large the Portuguese bicycle industry is, as I thought we had none. I assumed we wouldn’t be able to compete with you guys, but turns out the Dutch are that Big an importer

    • Jentu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I’m still using a (Son) dynamo Busch and Müller light from a decade ago on my touring bike. It’s so reliable and the beam pattern is better than on my car. I also have schwalbe marathons and ortlieb panniers on that bike. Such a good setup for a bike built like a tank. It might be fully German if it wasn’t a Fuji with a Shimano groupset.

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Plus the general accessibility to free bike workshops that seem to be run by various nonprofits.