Some particularly passionate fans had camped out in Manhattan overnight—in some cases, for multiple nights—in advance of the Sunday event, but were caught short after realizing there were no toilets available.

“We’re peeing in bags and little cups, and we had to put up a little portable privacy shower so people didn’t have to look at each other when they did that,” one such camper told the New York Post, having arrived for the rally on Friday morning.

While many turned to makeshift bathroom set-ups, others decided to simply avoid liquids so as not to fall victim to the call of nature.

The Post also spoke to one single parent who’d arrived at Madison Square Garden early Sunday morning with her 7-year-old daughter—who she described as a keen Trump fan.

“You just can’t drink any fluids. We got here a little after 6 a.m… so we’re going to tough it out and not drink or eat anything. It’s kind of insane that there’s no provision at all for people who are going to be waiting this long,” the woman said.

  • officermike@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    118
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    It’s kind of insane that there’s no provision at all for people who are going to be waiting this long

    It’s kind of insane that there’s people waiting this long

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Oh please, nobody forced them to pee in bottles. They could have left.

    They chose to pee in bottles.

  • Myxomatosis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    I’m sure those nasty little MAGATs left their piss bottles and trash everywhere. Also, the parents of that seven year old girl should be reported to CPS.

  • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    In a line of compassionate people, the one behind would recognize the commitment of having showed up days early, and would be willing to save one’s place long enough for a pee. In a line of trustworthy people, the promise “I’ll bring you back a bagel” would be a transaction worth saving a place for.

    These people are neither.

  • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    8 days ago

    “Forced”

    I do not think this word means what you think it does.

    Let the idiots pee in their cups and dehydrate themselves to watch the racists.

  • Noxy@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    8 days ago

    “You just can’t drink any fluids. We got here a little after 6 a.m… so we’re going to tough it out and not drink or eat anything. It’s kind of insane that there’s no provision at all for people who are going to be waiting this long,” the woman said.

    a microcosm of what the next presidency with this fuck would look like, and they just don’t see it, they never see it.

  • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    They are so proud to take last places in the line for a literal toilet of a rally and disturbed at a thought that some blacks, latinos, liberals, leftists don’t want that to be the case for everyone not born rich or of a right color. They are the most adoring fans and they are segregated out to wait like everyone else. Just like they wait for anything positive to happen in their county to no result.

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    8 days ago
    The Daily Beast - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for The Daily Beast:

    Wiki: mixed - There is no consensus on the reliability of The Daily Beast. Most editors consider The Daily Beast a biased or opinionated source. Some editors advise particular caution when using this source for controversial statements of fact related to living persons.


    MBFC: Left - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America


    New York Post - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for New York Post:

    Wiki: unreliable - There is consensus the New York Post is generally unreliable for factual reporting, especially with regard to politics, particularly New York City politics. A tabloid newspaper, editors criticise its lack of concern for fact-checking or corrections, including examples of outright fabrication. Editors consider the New York Post more reliable before it changed ownership in 1976, and particularly unreliable for coverage involving the New York City Police Department. A 2024 RfC concluded that the New York Post is marginally reliable for entertainment coverage; see below. This consensus does not apply to the broadsheet publication of the same name, that existed from 1801–1942.
    Wiki: mixed - There is consensus that the New York Post (nypost.com  ) and its sub-publications Decider (decider.com  ) and Page Six are considered to be marginally reliable sources for entertainment coverage, including reviews, but should not be used for controversial statements related to living persons.


    MBFC: Right-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America


    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://nypost.com/2024/10/27/us-news/trump-nyc-rally-crowd-pissed-about-lack-of-toilets/
    https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-fans-forced-to-pee-in-bottles-while-in-line-for-nyc-rally/

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support