• drake@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    pretty much every study of these sort of things show that there is very little difference in performance between women and men - maybe on the scale of 5%. There is more difference between members of the group than there is between the genders. so it didn’t really make much difference when it came to deciding who should do what.

    ultimately, it doesn’t matter, the difference is so slight that it was basically not noticeable, if it even did exist.

    all modern anthropological research demonstrates that women and men pretty much did an equal share of all tasks, including hunting and raising children. if your masculinity can’t handle that fact then I’d recommend therapy.

    • Steak@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      You really like that therapy line huh. Look there is a reason we have womans and men’s divisions in sports. Men would destroy the woman at almost all sports. If your fragile femininity cannot handle that, I recommend therapy. This has nothing to do with my masculinity and everything to with science and results. Sorry it doesn’t work out the way you want it to. Again. Therapy.

      Edit: word

      • drake@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Actually, the history of why women divisions arose in sports is far more nuanced than you seem to believe. The main reasons for doing so were primarily rooted in sexism. Historical records show that women were able to compete with, and win against, men in sporting events during the early middle ages.

        Anyways, I see there’s no reasoning with you, so I hope you have a pleasant evening