New research shows driverless car software is significantly more accurate with adults and light skinned people than children and dark-skinned people.

      • ShadowRam@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        because proper driverless cares properly use LIDAR, which doesn’t give a shit about your skin color.

        And can easily see an object the size of a child out to many metres in front, and doesn’t give a shit if its a child or not. It’s an object in the path or object with a vector that will about to be in the path.

        So change 'Driverless Cars" to “Elon’s poor implementation of a Driverless Car”

        Or better yet…

        “Camera only AI-powered pedestrian detection systems” are Worse at Spotting Kids and Dark-Skinned People

        • stopthatgirl7@kbin.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ok, but this isn’t just about Elon and Tesla?

          The study examined eight AI-powered pedestrian detection systems used for autonomous driving research.

          They tested multiple systems to see this problem.

      • lefixxx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        First impression I got is driverless cars are worst at detecting kids and black people than drivers

        • stopthatgirl7@kbin.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think that’s more it’s a headline that can be misinterpreted than misleading. I read it as it was detailed later, as worse are spotting kids and dark-skinned folks than at adults and light-skinned people. It can be ambiguous.