Why do Brits and Americans have a special term instead of just using Immigrant?

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      To be fair, they are pretty bad, unless you do like America and only allow people with certain skills and intelligence. Allowing refugees from war torn countries is very nice, but ultimately brings that war to the country itself and changes the culture into something very different.

      Source: Sweden.

      • TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Bro skilled people wanting to become US residents or citizens have to wait an absurd amount of time to even have a chance

          • TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            No, it’s because there’s a lottery system that has been backlogged for decades. US immigration is such a bad process that skilled people go to Canada instead because the government there actually values those people.

        • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Do you seriously need someone to explain to you why there are multiple words with similar meanings in the world?

          • Windex007@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            They aren’t used interchangeably so this implies a different definition or at least distinct connotations.

          • lime!@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            well when you challenge an opinion you usually offer an alternative opinion.

            • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              Usually. But if the premise is particularly stupid I might choose to prompt the speaker to actually think about what they’ve said for a moment.

              Or you could just read any of the numerous other comments here which offer other explanations.

              • lime!@feddit.nu
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                i did think about it and it matches my experience. i will read the rest of the thread.

                Edit: i have now read the rest of the thread. nobody seems to agree and i see no sources.

                • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  You’re looking for a source for the answer to a question so idiotic that it has probably never been asked before in the history of man?

                  You can’t be a real person.