• Apepollo11@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    From an outsider’s perspective, I think a lot of people think you guys sailed past the point of no return back in the 80s.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      What?!

      The 80s were fucked, but if you’re saying it was worse than the response to the Civil Rights movement…

      McCarthyism…

      Jim Crow…

      Or the KKK destroying reconstruction…

      Like, I could see saying that last one was the point, only if you start the clock immediately after resolving the civil war. Cause obviously a Civil War is what really happens after a point of no return. We lasted a couple years in between the two points.

      For as fucked as the last 40 years has been, as far as America goes we’re beating the average on basic human decency.

      What’s happening now isn’t new, it’s a slip backwards, which is unfortunately common when you try to fight fascism with moderate politics. It works for a little bit because they’re coasting off the last people who really fought. But all moderate politcs really are, is giving fascist time to regroup in the shadows like fucking Sauron.

      It’s a cycle, and we live in a time when you can learn pretty much anything about history in a few minutes on Wikipedia

      America can not afford for voters to stay ignorant. We need people who know what happened last time, what worked then, and what might work again. Stop acting like we live in unprecedented times, and start reading up on how fascism has been defeated historically.

      Cuz we’re up, like it or not shits getting real again. And the more people know what we’re doing then better.

    • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Remember when the entire world was convinced there was absolutely no way Bush, an idiot, fascist, religion bigot, etc could get re-elected?

      • kitnaht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Nobody thought that at all. Most presidents sitting during outbreaks of war retain their positions. You’d have to have been in a complete echo chamber to believe this stance. The moment 9/11 happened, it solidified Bush’s Second term in stone.

        I assume you mean Jr. Because Sr wasn’t the moron that Jr was.

        • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah no, I’m gonna disagree. Being outside of the US at the time, most people did think that. And yes, obviously I’m talking about Jr since Sr didn’t get re-elected. 9/11 was a full three years before the election of his second term.

          • kitnaht@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            It was viewed as illegitimate inside the US too. And yeah, I remember, even as a 17yr old at the time, seeing the event happen live and lamenting to my mother that we were going to have another Bush term over it. Historically for America that’s always been the case.

            • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              It was viewed as illegitimate inside the US too.

              You’re recollection of events is clearly skewed. Something like 80% of the population approved of it at first. Meanwhile there were protests in the millions of people around the world against it.

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_opinion_in_the_United_States_on_the_invasion_of_Iraq

              A Gallup poll made on behalf of CNN and USA Today concluded that 79% of Americans thought the Iraq War was justified, with or without conclusive evidence of illegal weapons.

              • kitnaht@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                You should read your own link, because it also mentions that by the end of his term, most disapproved. By 2006 it was viewed as illegitimate by most. My recollection of events is fine, thanks.

                America will generally approve of measures when they are led to believe it affects their security and safety. It’s the years afterwards that determine if it continues to hold support.

                • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  You should read your own link, because it also mentions that by the end of his term, most disapproved

                  I clearly stated “at first”.

              • Asafum@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                It’s so fucking disgusting to be honest… I’m just a worthless dumb shit uneducated factory worker and at 17 I could see right through that garbage… We’re a hateful group of people whether we care to admit it or not, there was a lot of anti-islamic/Muslim/Arab sentiment in the US at thst time. People were bloodthirsty.

                I was going to join the military after highschool to get training since I’m poor and had no real direction to gamble on college, and then take it from there whether to stay in or not. Once talk started of invading Iraq I immediately said fuccccck that. I still blame Bush partially for my current situation. :/

    • Magister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Reagan, he is the starting point of everything: the tax cut from 73% to 28%. USA never got back on track after this.

      • NABDad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Nope. Johnson.

        No, not that one.

        Andrew Johnson.

        So many ways it could have been better.

        He could have punished the Southern Aristocracy for starting the civil war. He could have ensured that the evil that led us there was exterminated forever.

        Failing that, they could have actually removed him via impeachment instead of falling just short. That would have at least established forever that the presidency is not some sacred “unimpeachable” office.