• n2burns@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Just to clarify, I’m using the term Monarchist in the Canadian context, as opposed to someone who wants to remove the Royal Family as Head of State, often called a Republican (though I know some Canadians don’t like that given it’s other meaning . . . nearby). I don’t a Monarchy is a good idea, I just like the Westminster System of Government. I just think that part of our current system works pretty well, and I don’t think the other options are all that appealing (a different Head of State, either elected or appointed, or one person who is both head of State and Head of Government).

    However, I also acknowledge that I am biased. I’m a white person whose who lineage is all from the UK, some of it only a couple generations back. I grew up listening to the Queen’s Christmas broadcast and hearing stories about the adventures of my ancestors who served throughout the empire. I don’t have any of the trauma mentioned in this story.

    • Vodulas [they/them]@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Huh, I always thought the monarchy was a figurehead role in Canada’s government. Seems to me that should be an elected position, not one granted by birth, but that is just my first gut response. I’ll for sure have to look more into it, thanks for the answer.

      • Marcello@mastodon.bida.im
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 hours ago

        @Vodulas @n2burns

        There really is not much to look into, past elementary school knowledge of what a King is.

        You don’t need trauma to see monarchy has no place in society. In Italy we kicked the King out after WWII and we now have a long term (7 years) head of state that more or less encompass a bipartisan role as a keeper of the constitution.