• Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    50k us is about what I make now and I’m in the suburbs.

    Invested safely that’s what I would make with 1m, with 2m I’m having the time of my life.

    I could have lived off that at any age as I’m currently making the most I’ve ever made by about 6k compared to my previous job…

    • fishpen0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The thing you may be forgetting to account for is inflation. 50k a year means your drawing the whole profit annually and in 10 or 20 years suddenly 50k is not enough to live on. You need enough in the fund to ensure it’s making more money than you spend so it can grow YoY and make more each year to cover inflation.

      Additionally, if you are not working you are paying 100% out of pocket for insurance. One health incident draws your savings below the amount you need to live off of.

      Right now they say not to retire at 60 unless you fully own your property and have over a million in your 401k. And that’s accounting for taking a loss to your social security payments past 67 due to early withdrawal and for out of pocket health insurance costs. If you are younger you need even more.