• SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    His voters haven’t been effected yet, when that happens, then something will happen. Maybe.

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 month ago

        Every tyrant everywhere and across all of history needs at minimum the acquiescence of his subjects. If we’re going to resist this we need to wake people from this idea that’s been drilled into us that voting is the only way to change politics. It’s not and never has been.

        • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          This is something that I wish more people understood.

          There is no amount of authoritarianism, no amount of tyranny, that can govern an ungovernable populace. Every nation, ultimately, has the government that enough people are willing to accept. The arc between tyranny and liberty can only move the line on what constitutes “enough”.

    • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Nah, they are too stupid, stubborn, mean-spirited, and oblivious to care. If they even notice they’ll just blame the democrats as they always do.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Oh once that happens I imagine we’ll get the “Second amendment people” who can “do something about that”