President in effect endorses ethnic cleansing of territory before hosting meeting with Benjamin Netanyahu

Donald Trump has said that Palestinians have “no alternative” but to leave Gaza due to the devastation left by Israel’s war on Hamas, in effect endorsing ethnic cleansing of the territory over the opposition of Palestinians and the neighbouring countries.

Speaking as he prepared to host Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, on Tuesday, Trump repeated the suggestion that Gaza’s population should be relocated to Jordan and Egypt – something both countries have firmly rejected.

Trump claimed Palestinians would “love to leave Gaza”, telling reporters: “I would think that they would be thrilled.”

MBFC
Archive

  • superkret@feddit.orgEnglish
    653·
    1 day ago

    In 1940, the Nazis’ plan was to relocate all Jews to Madagascar.
    Just 2 years later, they started exterminating them systematically.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.worldEnglish
      151·
      22 hours ago

      Yup.

      They went from passing oppressive laws against Jews to turning them to ash in a frighteningly short period of time.

      Fascism is 100% here and our nation is asleep at the fucking wheel.

      Never been more ashamed to be an American.

    • bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      322·
      1 day ago

      Population transfers aren’t unheard of. In Greece/Turkey, Italians from eastern Adriatic, German from Prussia and Silesia, Pakistan/India millions of people moved.

      This Holocaust comparison is completely dishonest and betrays any knowledge of how it happened. Used in this context, it’s Holocaust relativism at best and likely antisemitic.

      • Siegfried@lemmy.worldEnglish
        11·
        21 hours ago

        Well, i have bad news… all of those were genocides

        Edir: purging an etnicity from a land to gain a claim over that territory makes it sound bad enough?

      • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
        5·
        19 hours ago

        I found this quote useful so I’m going to put it here as well as it seems incredibly relevant.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_cleansing

        “How could ‘forced deportation’ ever be achieved without extreme coercion, indeed violence? How, indeed, could deportation not be forced? How could people not resist? How could it not involve the destruction of a community, of the way of life that a group has enjoyed over a period of time? How could those who deported a group not intend this destruction? In what significant way is the forcible removal of a population from their homeland different from the destruction’ of a group? If the boundary between ‘cleansing’ and genocide is unreal, why police it?”

        • bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          1·
          3 hours ago

          From the same Wikipedia article.

          Ethnic cleansing has been described as part of a continuum of violence whose most extreme form is genocide. Ethnic cleansing is similar to forced deportation or population transfer. While ethnic cleansing and genocide may share the same goal and methods (e.g., forced displacement), ethnic cleansing is intended to displace a persecuted population from a given territory, while genocide is intended to destroy a group.

          Your quote is just a bunch of insinuations leading questions without an answer. Pure bad faith.