This might seem obviously “yes” at first, but consider a method like foo.debugRepr()
which outputs the string FOO
and has documentation which says it is meant only to be used for logging / debugging. Then you make a new release of your library and want to update the debug representation to be **FOO**
.
Based on the semantics of debugRepr()
I would argue that this is NOT a breaking change even though it is returning a different value, because it should only affect logging. However, if someone relies on this and uses it the wrong way, it will break their code.
What do you think? Is this a breaking change or not?
This is https://www.hyrumslaw.com/.
Basically there are two types of breaking changes:
What you are experiencing with
debugRepr()
is that you have triggered 1. You have made a chance that may break a user. But you have not triggered 2 because the new output is still within the previous contract. What level of stability you want to uphold is up to you.