What an utter piece of shit.

    • deadtom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      126
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not anymore. They gave them to Russia under guarantees they wouldt do… pretty much everything they are doing right now.

      I’m starting to think Russia might not be trustworthy…

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, in the mid 90s the world was so optimistic about Russia, and frankly reassured about the nukes going to Russia, which was believed to be the more confidently governed nation state.

        Everyone was still riding high on the cold war seemingly coming to a close.

      • MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        70
        ·
        1 year ago

        Too bad so sad! Should have been smart like Kim Jong. Keep some nukes and you don’t get invaded.

      • kava@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think he addressed it clearly enough. Russia invading Ukraine has no risk of Ukraine starting a nuclear war. Why? Because Ukraine does not have nukes.

        A country like Russia, if facing an existential threat, has the capacity and incentive to use nuclear weapons. Why? Because they have nukes.

        This is why even the US had hesitations last year (same time this Starlink episode happened) about sending certain types of weapons to Ukraine - out of fear of nuclear escalation. Now that Ukraine has drone striked Russian territory a few times it seems obvious because nuclear escalation hasn’t happened… but Musk was not alone in thinking this. Remember that US refused to give all sorts of weaponry at first. They didn’t want to give fighters jets, tanks, etc.