• Unforeseen@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Finland and northern Japan are microscopic compared to Canada (or the USA). The reason it’s feasible there does not make it feasible here.

    • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I hear this argument a lot but it doesn’t make any sense. The size of the country doesn’t matter for your daily commute.

      It’s also nonsensical because living without cars was feasible in Canada and the US 100 years ago, and remains feasible in many small towns and big cities. Winnipeg, Calgary, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, Kansas City… they all had efficient and extensive tram and bus systems in the pre-war era. The walkable neighborhoods made before cars remain some of the most valuable and sought after real estate in North America.

      • Dr_pepper_spray@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe in the cities. However in the 20s, for rural areas, Horse and carts were still in use. Automobiles replaced them.

        • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          A lot of rural areas built walkable town centres which still exist today. But sure, some areas will always need cars. That said, over 80% of the population of US and Canada today lives in urban areas, so let’s at least work on that 80%. It doesn’t have to be all or nothing.

    • Blubton@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Most of the people in both Finland and Japan live in cities, while most North Americans live in cities. Moving away from cars in rural areas may not be easy, but there is no reason why it would not be possible in the cities. The things that are needed are: denser cities (less tight zoning laws) and more alternatives to driving, like bike lanes or trams. These things are achievable by policy change. Also, the USA has around five times as much population density across the country as Finland, so while it may be big, it is not too big for decent alternatives to driving

    • Dr_pepper_spray@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Quick googling says Finland has 3.6 Million passenger vehicles for about 5.5 Million people. You want to hold up a shining example of a carless culture? try North Korea.