Apple forced to ditch iPhone lightning charger::Apple confirms new iPhone 15 will have a common USB-C charging port after EU forces it into the change.

  • bob_wiley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    43
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why would the 2015 MacBook’s USB-C ports been forced by necessity?

    Also remember the outrage when Apple moved form the 30-pin connector to Lightning. People were very upset and Apple promised they wouldn’t be switching ports all the time and it was made to serve them for a really long time… as every accessory with a lightning port just became e-waste. I guess Mother Nature didn’t see that.

    • Rootiest@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      as every accessory with a lightning port just became e-waste. I guess Mother Nature didn’t see that.

      I think it’s interesting that you see this as USB-C’s fault.

      If Apple had stuck to a standard connector they would have been on usb-c in a year or two anyway and none of that e-waste would exist.

      Or if they went back on their word and switched to usb-c from lightning after a couple years, there would also be way less Lightning e-waste. What do you think happens to all those Lightning accessories when someone switches from iPhone to a different device?

      Apple’s proprietary Lightning connector is responsible for the e-waste, not USB-C or regulators.

      These regulations will stop companies like Apple making proprietary connectors purely for profit that generate all the e-waste in the first place.

      • Petter1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lol, a cable is barely e waste. The power Adapter is where the e waste is, and those usb A blocks can easily still be used, even if you only have usb-C cables lying around. For very little money, you can buy an Adapter from usb-A to C and you can still use them. I don’t get the eWaste argument on copper cables…

      • bob_wiley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        There were no good standards when Lightning was released. There were several different USB options… mini, micro, etc, all of which only worked one way and sucked to use. If I remember correctly there was also something related to audio that USB at the time wasn’t good at, which lightning could handle. Hence the removal of the headphone jack.

        • Rootiest@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          USB-C was finalized 2 years later so the decade of Lighting e-waste is still on Apple for holding out as long as they did.

          Maybe instead of designing a whole new Lightning connector they should have been pioneers and been one of the first to make a USB-C phone.

          • bob_wiley@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            19
            ·
            1 year ago

            No one wants a new connector every 2 years. When Lightning was announced the 30-pin connector was in service for almost a decade and they said Lightning was designed for the next decade. So now it’s been a decade and they changed again. I guess we’ll see another new connector sometime around 2033, if USB can keep itself together long enough. It’s fragmentation is a bit of a joke.

            • Rootiest@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              If they kept the 30-pin for another year or two they could have been one of the first with USB-C and it would have been good for two decades or more and we wouldn’t be having this discussion

                • Rootiest@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  If only they had the foresight to predict the needs of their customers a year or two in the future.

                  Or maybe they just went with Lightning because they could take a cut of every product using their proprietary connector.

                  • bob_wiley@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    10
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    They did have the foresight, it’s why they started working on Lightning and has it ready for production release in 2012. From what I could find, the initial press release around USB-C was in 2013, with initial submission in 2012.

                    I’m not going to spend days reaching this, but it seems possible that USB-C was a response to Lightning based on that timeline, so since where playing the “if” and “maybe” game, which I’m pretty much done with now. Neither of us have inside information and this is all hypothetical nonsense.

        • Elektrotechnik@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          “Hence the removal of the headphone jack.”

          What does that have to do with USB vs Lightning? Besides, Lightning to Headphone Jack adapters as well as lightning airpods use a DAC inside the cable.

          Boy, some of you are really drinking the Apple koolaid.

    • BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      As far as I know the fastest charging over lightning even now is 20 Watts which is far too slow for a laptop with a large battery. I suspect that they couldn’t use lightning on the macbooks for that reason.

      If their intention was to limit waste then they wouldn’t have continued to produce lightning accessories if the plan was to transition in just a few years

      • mark3748@geddit.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Laptops were never charged with lightning and it makes zero sense that they ever would. It was never necessary and they received a LOT of hate over using USB-C on the laptops because they were extremely early to the party. The exact same hate was heaped on them when they implemented USB before everyone else.

        You apparently don’t remember (or care) about how they faced a lot of backlash when they moved from the 30-pin to Lightning on iPhone. They promised accessory manufacturers that they wouldn’t change the iPhone port again for at least 10 years, and we are right at that mark. Other products have been transitioning to USB-C in a somewhat logical order. All of the products that charge with lightning now are iPhone accessories and there is little reason to have different charge ports on products that are meant to be used together.

        The only argument that isn’t just pure ignorance seems to boil down to “Apple evil”

      • bob_wiley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lightning was never on the MacBooks, so that’s not a reason for the MacBooks to move to USB-C. Prior to USB-C MacBooks used MagSafe to charge, which is what the new ones are back to using.